Genome biologyGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Comparison of spatial transcriptomics technologies used for tumor cryosections
Anne RademacheriD, Alik HuseynoviD, Michele BortolomeazziiD, Sina Jasmin WilleiD, Sabrina SchumacheriD, Pooja SantiD, Denise Keitel, Konstantin OkonechnikoviD, David R. GhasemiiD, Kristian W. PajtleriD, Jan‐Philipp MallmiD, Karsten RippeiD
Abstract
BackgroundSpatial transcriptomics (ST) technologies are revolutionizing our understanding of intra-tumor heterogeneity and the tumor microenvironment by revealing single-cell molecular profiles within their spatial tissue context. The rapid evolution of ST methods, each with unique features, presents a challenge in selecting the most appropriate technology for specific research objectives. Here, we compare four imaging-based ST methods - RNAscope HiPlex, Molecular Cartography, MERFISH/Merscope, and Xenium - together with sequencing-based ST (Visium). These technologies were used to study cryosections of medulloblastoma with extensive nodularity (MBEN), a tumor chosen for its distinct microanatomical features. ResultsOur analysis reveals that automated imaging-based ST methods are well suited to delineating the intricate MBEN microanatomy, capturing cell-type-specific transcriptome profiles. We devise approaches to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the different methods together with their unique attributes to guide method selection based on the research aim. Furthermore, we demonstrate how reimaging of slides after the ST analysis can markedly improve cell segmentation accuracy and integrate additional transcript and protein readouts to expand the analytical possibilities and depth of insights. ConclusionsThis study highlights key distinctions between various ST technologies and provides a set of parameters for evaluating their performance. Our findings aid in the informed choice of ST methods and delineate approaches for enhancing the resolution and breadth of spatial transcriptomic analyses, thereby contributing to advancing ST applications in solid tumor research.
- organism: human
- assay: spatial transcriptomics
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: spatial domain detection
- approach: statistical model
- approach: benchmark study
- Citations
- 36
- FWCI
- 8.07
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparison of imaging-based single-cell resolution spatial transcriptomics profiling platforms using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples
Nejla Ozirmak Lermi, Max Molina Ayala, … Luisa M. Solis Soto·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 26, 2025
- Seq-Scope Protocol: Repurposing Illumina Sequencing Flow Cells for High-Resolution Spatial Transcriptomics
Yongsung Kim, Weiqiu Cheng, … Jun Hee Lee·Nature ProtocolsPeer-reviewed·Oct 31, 2024
- Utility of cellular imaging modality in subcellular spatial transcriptomic profiling of tumor tissues
Xiaofei Song, Xiaoqing Yu, … Xuefeng Wang·bioRxiv·Jul 25, 2024
- Cell segmentation for high-resolution spatial transcriptomics
Hao Chen, Dongshunyi Li, Ziv Bar‐Joseph·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Jul 10, 2023
- FICTURE: Scalable segmentation-free analysis of submicron resolution spatial transcriptomics
Yichen Si, ChangHee Lee, … Hyun Min Kang·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Sep 12, 2024
- TIST: Transcriptome and Histopathological Image Integrative Analysis for Spatial Transcriptomics
Yiran Shan, Qian Zhang, … Jin Gu·Genomics Proteomics & BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2022