The tissue specificity of cancer genes
Abstract
Defining genes that are somatically mutated in different cancers is a central goal of cancer genetics. Nevertheless, traditional definitions of "driver" genes based on pooled mutation frequency are biased toward common cancer types and tend to overlook genes that might be specific to rarer subtypes. As such, our understanding of the compendium of cancer genes is incomplete. In this study, we developed a statistical framework that defines genes enriched for functional somatic mutations in primary cancers to quantify incidence and tissue specificity for each gene. By applying this framework to the AACR GENIE v18.0 dataset, which comprised over 1.15 million mutations identified in 146,394 patients spanning 265 histologic subtypes, we identified a total of 95 genes significantly mutated in at least one subtype. We mined this dataset to derive tissue specificity scores for all 95 genes, demonstrating that tissue specificity in cancer is the norm, not the exception, for nearly all genes. We interrogated these new tissue specificity scores to reveal that oncogenes with restricted expression across normal tissues tend to exhibit higher tissue-specific mutation patterns in cancer. In contrast, tumor suppressors were often ubiquitously expressed irrespective of their underlying tissue specificity, which was partially correlated with differentially expressed compensatory genes and pathways in mutationally permissive tissues. Significance StatementWe present a statistically robust, subtype-aware framework to identify tissue-specific cancer driver genes and uncover their underlying biology. Our findings reveal that tissue-selective oncogenicity arises from expression constraints and tissue-restricted compensatory pathways. These findings provide a systematic, well-powered resource on mutational significance, tissue tropism, and biological consequences for the cancer research community.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Integrating gene mutation spectra from tumors and the general population with gene expression topological networks to identify novel cancer driver genes
Dan He, Ling Li, … Huiying Zhao·bioRxiv·May 2, 2023
- Mutational Landscape of Cancer-Driver Genes Across Human Cancers
Musalula Sinkala·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Aug 7, 2023
- Tissue-specific cancer paradox and mutation rates
Valentina Agoni·bioRxiv·Dec 15, 2014
- In silico saturation mutagenesis of cancer genes
F. Muinos, F. Martinez-Jimenez, … N. Lopez-Bigas·bioRxiv·Jun 3, 2020
- Co-expression in tissue-specific gene networks links genes in cancer-susceptibility loci to known somatic driver genes
Carlos G. Urzúa-Traslaviña, Tijs van Lieshout, … Lude Franke·BMC Medical GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jul 15, 2024
- Mutation bias in driver genes reveals the distribution of effects of oncogenic mutations
Anastasia V. Stolyarova, Georgii A. Bazykin·bioRxiv·Sep 25, 2025