Experimental Brain ResearchNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Individual differences in learning and decision-making: the role of COMT Val158Met polymorphism in transitive inference
Ann PauliD, Mariella SegretiiD, Isabel Beatrice MarciD, Maria Teresa FiorenzaiD, Sonia CanteriniiD, Surabhi RamawatiD, Giampiero BardellaiD, Pierpaolo PaniiD, Stefano FerrainaiD, Emiliano BrunamontiiD
Abstract
Understanding the ordinal relationships between items requires constructing a rank order supporting decision-making between options. This process depends on the ability to learn reciprocal relationships and to select the best option available when making a choice. In such forms of decision-making, the prefrontal cortex (PFC) plays a crucial role in encoding the relative value of alternatives as a decision is formed. Higher-order cognitive abilities are influenced by genetic factors that affect dopamine availability in the PFC, potentially contributing to individual differences. Here, we examined the performance of 83 participants in a transitive inference task (TI), grouped by genotype based on the Val158Met single-nucleotide polymorphism in the Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT) gene. The task included a learning phase in which participants acquired the reciprocal relationships among a set of hierarchically ranked items (A>B>C>D>E>F), followed by a test phase in which they were required to compare all possible item pairs and select the higher-ranked one. While genotype did not significantly influence test-phase performance, it did affect learning efficiency. Specifically, Val homozygotes took a longer learning procedure than both heterozygotes and Met homozygotes during the learning phase. Drift diffusion modelling (DDM) revealed that task performance was explained by the efficiency of evidence accumulation, which was lower in Val homozygotes, accounting for their poorer performance not only during initial learning but also when required to switch to a reversed hierarchical structure (A<B<C<D<E<F). These findings suggest that individual differences in inferential decision-making and cognitive flexibility may be partially driven by genetically determined variations in prefrontal dopamine availability.
- organism: human
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.93
- Field percentile
- top 6%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- COMT Val158Met polymorphism associated with greater susceptibility to framing effects in healthy older adults
Carson M. Quinn, Mia Borzello, … Winston Chiong·bioRxiv·Oct 2, 2019
- Motivational learning biases are differentially modulated by genetic determinants of striatal and prefrontal dopamine function
Anni Richter, Lieke de Boer, … Björn Hendrik Schott·Journal of Neural TransmissionPeer-reviewed·Jul 23, 2021
- Effects of catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibition on effort-related choice behavior in male mice
Adrienne C. DeBrosse, Abigail M. Wheeler, … Gregory V. Carr·bioRxiv·Jan 28, 2020
- Different contribution of the monkey prefrontal and premotor dorsal cortex in decision making during a transitive inference task
S. Ramawat, V. Mione, … E. Brunamonti·bioRxiv·Jul 26, 2021
- Ontogeny of catechol-o-methyltransferase expression in the rat prefrontal cortex: effects of methamphetamine exposure
Lauren K. Carrica, Joshua Michael Gulley·Developmental NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·May 30, 2025
- Novel, non-nitrocatechol COMT inhibitors modulate dopamine neurotransmission in the frontal cortex and improve cognitive flexibility
Spencer Byers, Ingrid P. Buchler, … Gregory V. Carr·PsychopharmacologyPeer-reviewed·May 30, 2020