Imputation of fluid intelligence scores reduces ascertainment bias and increases power for analyses of common and rare variants

Abstract

Studying the genetics of measures of intelligence can help us understand the neurobiology of cognitive function and the aetiology of rare neurodevelopmental conditions. The largest previous genetic studies of measures of intelligence have used [~]270k individuals who completed the fluid intelligence (FI) test in UK Biobank. Here, we integrate additional FI measures in this cohort and leverage eighty-two correlated variables to impute FI values for unmeasured individuals, increasing the sample size to >450k. Through population-based and within-family genome-wide association studies and downstream analyses, we show that this imputation produces a phenotype that genetically resembles measured FI and reduces ascertainment bias within the cohort. We further show that combining measured and imputed FI scores increases the number of independent SNP associations (p31k patients with developmental disorders (p=6.8x10-4). We further identify three genes showing significant rare variant associations with educational attainment but not with FI, including CADPS2 in which, unusually, protein-truncating variants show a positive association. Our results demonstrate the power of phenotype imputation for genetic studies and suggest that incorporating genetic association results for cognitive phenotypes in the general population could help discover new developmental disorder genes.