Sign in
Molecular BiologyEuropean Journal of Epidemiology
Peer-reviewed journal article

The AccelerAge framework: A new statistical approach to predict biological age based on time-to-event data

Marije H. SluiskesiD, Jelle J. GoemaniD, Marian BeekmaniD, P. Eline SlagboomiD, Erik B. van den AkkeriD, Hein PutteriD, Mar Rodríguez‐GirondoiD

Abstract

Aging is a multifaceted and intricate physiological process characterized by a gradual decline in functional capacity, leading to increased susceptibility to diseases and mortality. While chronological age serves as a strong risk factor for age-related health conditions, considerable heterogeneity exists in the aging trajectories of individuals, suggesting that biological age may provide a more nuanced understanding of the aging process. However, the concept of biological age lacks a clear operationalization, leading to the development of various biological age predictors without a solid statistical foundation. This paper addresses these limitations by proposing a comprehensive operationalization of biological age, introducing the "AccelerAge" framework for predicting biological age, and introducing previously underutilized evaluation measures for assessing the performance of biological age predictors. The AccelerAge framework, based on Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) models, directly models the effect of candidate predictors of aging on an individuals survival time, aligning with the prevalent metaphor of aging as a clock. We compare predictors based on the AccelerAge framework to a predictor based on the GrimAge predictor, which is considered one of the best-performing biological age predictors, using simulated data as well as data from the UK Biobank and the Leiden Longevity Study. Our approach seeks to establish a robust statistical foundation for biological age clocks, enabling a more accurate and interpretable assessment of an individuals aging status.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
14
FWCI
1.69
Field percentile
top 15%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISWang '26Sluiskes '24Song '26Pyrkov '19Ying '24Libert '25
77% semantic matchBioinformatics
Chen Wang, Hanqing Wu, Shinichi Namba+6 more·bioRxiv·Aug 5, 2026