The AccelerAge framework: A new statistical approach to predict biological age based on time-to-event data
Marije H. SluiskesiD, Jelle J. GoemaniD, Marian BeekmaniD, P. Eline SlagboomiD, Erik B. van den AkkeriD, Hein PutteriD, Mar Rodríguez‐GirondoiD
Abstract
Aging is a multifaceted and intricate physiological process characterized by a gradual decline in functional capacity, leading to increased susceptibility to diseases and mortality. While chronological age serves as a strong risk factor for age-related health conditions, considerable heterogeneity exists in the aging trajectories of individuals, suggesting that biological age may provide a more nuanced understanding of the aging process. However, the concept of biological age lacks a clear operationalization, leading to the development of various biological age predictors without a solid statistical foundation. This paper addresses these limitations by proposing a comprehensive operationalization of biological age, introducing the "AccelerAge" framework for predicting biological age, and introducing previously underutilized evaluation measures for assessing the performance of biological age predictors. The AccelerAge framework, based on Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) models, directly models the effect of candidate predictors of aging on an individuals survival time, aligning with the prevalent metaphor of aging as a clock. We compare predictors based on the AccelerAge framework to a predictor based on the GrimAge predictor, which is considered one of the best-performing biological age predictors, using simulated data as well as data from the UK Biobank and the Leiden Longevity Study. Our approach seeks to establish a robust statistical foundation for biological age clocks, enabling a more accurate and interpretable assessment of an individuals aging status.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 14
- FWCI
- 1.69
- Field percentile
- top 15%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Beyond point estimates: quantifying predictive uncertainty reveals hidden dimensions of biological age acceleration and improves risk interpretation
Chen Wang, Hanqing Wu, … Iuliana Ionita‐Laza·bioRxiv·Aug 5, 2026
- Clarifying the biological and statistical assumptions of cross-sectional biological age predictors
Marije H. Sluiskes, Jelle J. Goeman, … Mar Rodríguez‐Girondo·BMC Medical Research MethodologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 8, 2024
- Inferential boundaries of age prediction: why prediction does not establish biological age measurement
Shiyu Song, Qiao Liang, Qian Gao·bioRxiv·Sep 29, 2026
- Biological age is a universal marker of aging, stress, and frailty
Timothy V. Pyrkov, Peter O. Fedichev·Healthy ageing and longevityPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2019
- High-dimensional Ageome Representations of Biological Aging across Functional Modules
Kejun Ying, Alexander Tyshkovskiy, … Vadim N. Gladyshev·bioRxiv·Sep 17, 2024
- A mathematical model that predicts human biological age from physiological traits identifies environmental and genetic factors that influence aging
Sergiy Libert, Alex Chekholko, Cynthia J. Kenyon·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jun 11, 2025