Frequency Effects on Spelling Error Recognition: An ERP Study
Abstract
Spelling errors are ubiquitous in all writing systems. Most studies exploring spelling errors focused on the phonological plausibility of errors. However, unlike typical pseudohomophones, spelling errors occur in naturally produced written language with variable frequencies. We investigated the time course of recognition of the most frequent orthographic errors in Russian (error in an unstressed vowel at the root) and the effect of word frequency on this process. During ERP recording, 26 native Russian speakers silently read high-frequency correctly spelled words, low-frequency correctly spelled words, high-frequency words with errors, and low-frequency words with errors. The amplitude of P200 was more positive for correctly spelled words than for misspelled words and did not depend on the frequency of the words. Word frequency affected spelling recognition in the later stages of word processing (350-700 ms): high-frequency misspelled words elicited a greater P300 than high-frequency correctly spelled words, and low-frequency misspelled words elicited a greater N400 than low-frequency correctly spelled words. We observe spelling effects in the same time window for both the P300 and N400, which may reflect temporal overlap between mainly categorization processes based on orthographic properties for high-frequency words and phonological processes for low-frequency words. We concluded that two independent pathways can be active simultaneously during spelling recognition: one reflects mainly orthographic processing of high-frequency words and the other is the phonological processing of low-frequency words. Our findings suggest that these pathways are associated with different ERP components. Therefore, our results complement existing reading models and demonstrate that the neuronal underpinnings of spelling error recognition during reading depend on word frequency.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 16
- FWCI
- 5.33
- Field percentile
- top 5%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Top-down Modulation of Brain Responses in Spelling Error Recognition
Ekaterina V. Larionova, Гарах Жанна Валерьевна, Olga Martynova·Acta PsychologicaPeer-reviewed·Mar 16, 2023
- Electrophysiological signatures of spelling sensitivity development from primary school age to adulthood
Ekaterina V. Larionova, Anna B. Rebreikina, Olga Martynova·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Mar 30, 2024
- Misspelled-word reading modulates late cortical dynamics
Jiaxin You, Aino Saranpää, … Riitta H. Salmelin·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2025
- Learning to read transforms phonological into phonographic representations: Evidence from a Mismatch Negativity study
Chotiga Pattamadilok, Shuai Wang, … Anne‐Sophie Dubarry·bioRxiv·Sep 10, 2024
- Attentional modulation of orthographic neighborhood effects during reading: Evidence from event-related brain potentials in a psychological refractory period paradigm
Milena Rabovsky, Markus Conrad, … Werner Sommer·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jan 25, 2019
- Onset-Rime Orthographic Representations in Early Literacy Development: A Neural Link Between Spelling and Reading
Fang Wang, Lindsey R. Hasak, … Bruce D. McCandliss·bioRxiv·Oct 14, 2026