Virus EvolutionGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Evaluation of NGS-based approaches for SARS-CoV-2 whole genome characterisation
Caroline CharreiD, Christophe GinévraiD, Marina SabatieriD, Hadrien RegueiD, Grégory DestrasiD, Solenne Brun, Gwendolyne Burfin, Caroline ScholtèsiD, Florence MorfiniD, Martine ValetteiD, Bruno LinaiD, Antonin BaliD, Laurence JossetiD
Abstract
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak, SARS-CoV-2 whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has been performed at unprecedented rate worldwide with the use of very diverse Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) methods. Herein, we compare the performance of four NGS-based approaches for SARS-CoV-2 WGS. Twenty four clinical respiratory samples with a large scale of Ct values (from 10.7 to 33.9) were sequenced with four methods. Three used Illumina sequencing: an in-house metagenomic NGS (mNGS) protocol and two newly commercialized kits including a hybridization capture method developed by Illumina (DNA Prep with Enrichment kit and Respiratory Virus Oligo Panel, RVOP) and an amplicon sequencing method developed by Paragon Genomics (CleanPlex SARS-CoV-2 kit). We also evaluated the widely used amplicon sequencing protocol developed by ARTIC Network and combined with Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequencing. All four methods yielded near-complete genomes (>99%) for high viral loads samples, with mNGS and RVOP producing the most complete genomes. For mid viral loads, 2/8 and 1/8 genomes were incomplete (<99%) with mNGS and both CleanPlex and RVOP, respectively. For low viral loads (Ct [≥]25), amplicon-based enrichment methods were the most sensitive techniques yielding complete genomes for 7/8 samples. All methods were highly concordant in terms of identity in complete consensus sequence. Just one mismatch in two samples was observed in CleanPlex vs the other methods, due to the dedicated bioinformatics pipeline setting a high threshold to call SNP compared to reference sequence. Importantly, all methods correctly identified a newly observed 34-nt deletion in ORF6 but required specific bioinformatic validation for RVOP. Finally, as a major warning for targeted techniques, a default of coverage in any given region of the genome should alert to a potential rearrangement or a SNP in primer annealing or probe-hybridizing regions and would require regular updates of the technique according to SARS-CoV-2 evolution.
- organism: virus
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 145
- FWCI
- 3.91
- Field percentile
- top 4%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A Benchmark of methods for SARS-CoV-2 whole genome sequencing and development of a more sensitive method
Anthony Bayega, Sarah Julia Reiling, … Jiannis Ragoussis·Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 15, 2025
- Target Capture Sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 Genomes Using the ONETest Coronaviruses Plus
Shing H. Zhan, Sepideh Massoumi Alamouti, … Kenneth H. Rand·Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious DiseasePeer-reviewed·Jul 23, 2021
- A benchmarking study of SARS-CoV-2 whole-genome sequencing protocols using COVID-19 patient samples
Tiantian Liu, Zhong Chen, … Charles Wang·iSciencePeer-reviewed·Jul 21, 2021
- Analytical validity of nanopore sequencing for rapid SARS-CoV-2 genome analysis
Rowena Anne Bull, Thiruni N. Adikari, … Ira W. Deveson·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Dec 9, 2020
- Rapid, sensitive, full genome sequencing of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Virus Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)
Clinton R. Paden, Ying Tao, … Suxiang Tong·Emerging infectious diseasesPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2020
- SARS-CoV-2 Genome Sequencing Methods Differ In Their Ability To Detect Variants From Low Viral Load Samples
C. Lam, K.-A. Gray, … R. J. Rockett·bioRxiv·May 1, 2021