Muscle & NerveNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
The Impact of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor rs6265 (Val66Met) Polymorphism on Therapeutic Electrical Stimulation for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: A Preclinical Study of Therapy-Genotype Interactions
Jordan B. WaltersiD, Maria J. QuezadaiD, Suning He, Ciara S. Haynes, Kathy Steece‐CollieriD, Timothy J. CollieriD, Caryl E. SortwelliD, Colin K. FranziD
Abstract
The Impact of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor rs6265 (Val66Met) Polymorphism on Therapeutic Electrical Stimulation for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: A Preclinical Study of Therapy-Genotype Interactions IntroductionPeripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) significantly impact patient quality of life. Therapeutic electrical stimulation (TES) shows promise in enhancing nerve regeneration, but outcomes vary widely. This study investigates the impact of the rs6265 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) on TES efficacy in a preclinical rat model and human stem cell-derived motor neurons. MethodsWild-type (WT) and rs6265 variant rats underwent sciatic nerve transection and received either TES or sham treatment. Muscle reinnervation was assessed through compound muscle action potentials and muscle fiber cross-sectional area. Isogenic human iPSC-derived motor neurons were used to study activity-dependent BDNF secretion. ResultsTES improved muscle reinnervation and fiber size in WT but not rs6265 allele carriers. rs6265 allele carriers exhibited impaired activity-dependent BDNF secretion in vitro. DiscussionThe rs6265 polymorphism influences TES efficacy, highlighting the need for personalized approaches in PNI treatment. These findings suggest that genetic screening could optimize therapeutic outcomes. Clinical RelevanceUnderstanding genetic factors affecting TES response can enhance treatment strategies for PNI, potentially improving patient recovery and reducing outcome variability.
- organism: rat
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: drug response / drug discovery
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 5
- FWCI
- 1.95
- Field percentile
- top 15%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Enhanced Peripheral Nerve Regeneration by Mechano-electrical Stimulation
Y. Tai, T. I. Tonmoy, … J. Nam·bioRxiv·Apr 20, 2023
- Combined Central and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Improves Functional Recovery of Mixed Peripheral Nerve Injury in a Rat Forelimb Model
Sahand C. Eftekari, Yong-Chul Yoon, … Aaron M. Dingle·bioRxiv·Jan 26, 2025
- Non-invasive neuromodulation using rTMS and the Electromagnetic-Perceptive Gene (EPG) facilitates plasticity after nerve injury
Carolina Cywiak, Ryan C. Ashbaugh, … Galit Pelled·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Oct 14, 2020
- Neuroskeletal effects of chronic bioelectric nerve stimulation in health and diabetes
A. T. Beeve, I. Shen, … E. L. Scheller·bioRxiv·Nov 24, 2020
- Enriching neural stem cell and pro-healing glial phenotypes with electrical stimulation after traumatic brain injury in male rats
E. Park, J. G. Lyon, … R. V. Bellamkonda·bioRxiv·Nov 7, 2020
- Noninvasive Stimulation of Peripheral Nerves using Temporally-Interfering Electrical Fields
Boris Botzanowski, Mary Jocelyn Donahue, … Adam Williamson·Advanced Healthcare MaterialsPeer-reviewed·Jun 25, 2022