Deconstructing Procedural Memory: Different Learning Trajectories and Consolidation of Sequence and Statistical Learning
Péter SimoriD, Zsófia ZavecziD, Kata Horváth, Noémi ÉltetőiD, Csenge Török, Orsolya PesthyiD, Ferenc GombosiD, Karolina JanacsekiD, Dezső NémethiD
Abstract
Procedural learning is a fundamental cognitive function that facilitates efficient processing of and automatic responses to complex environmental stimuli. Here, we examined training-dependent and off-line changes of two sub-processes of procedural learning: namely, sequence learning and statistical learning. Whereas sequence learning requires the acquisition of order-based relationships between the elements of a sequence, statistical learning is based on the acquisition of probabilistic associations between elements. Seventy-eight healthy young adults (58 females and 20 males) completed the modified version of the Alternating Serial Reaction Time task that was designed to measure Sequence and Statistical Learning simultaneously. After training, participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: active wakefulness, quiet rest, or daytime sleep. We examined off-line changes in Sequence and Statistical Learning as well as further improvements after extended practice. Performance in Sequence Learning increased during training, while Statistical Learning plateaued relatively rapidly. After the off-line period, both the acquired sequence and statistical knowledge was preserved, irrespective of the vigilance state (awake, quiet rest or sleep). Sequence Learning further improved during extended practice, while Statistical Learning did not. Moreover, within the sleep group, cortical oscillations and sleep spindle parameters showed differential associations with Sequence and Statistical Learning. Our findings can contribute to a deeper understanding of the dynamic changes of multiple parallel learning and consolidation processes that occur during procedural memory formation.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 93
- FWCI
- 7.13
- Field percentile
- top 2%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Intention to learn differentially affects subprocesses of procedural learning and consolidation: Evidence from a probabilistic sequence learning task
Kata Horváth, Csenge Török, … Karolina Janacsek·bioRxiv·Jul 8, 2019
- Statistical learning occurs during practice while high-order rule learning during rest period
Romain Quentin, Lison Fanuel, … Dezső Németh·npj Science of LearningPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2021
- The longer the better? General skill but not probabilistic learning improves with the duration of short rest periods
Lison Fanuel, Claire Plèche, … Dezső Németh·bioRxiv·May 12, 2020
- Manipulating the rapid consolidation periods in a learning task affects general skills more than statistical learning and change dynamics of learning
Laura Szücs-Bencze, Lison Fanuel, … Teodóra Vékony·bioRxiv·May 5, 2022
- Retrieval of a well-established skill is resistant to distraction: evidence from an implicit probabilistic sequence learning task
Teodóra Vékony, Lilla Török, … Dezső Németh·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Dec 10, 2020
- Stimulus presentation rates affect performance but not the acquired knowledge -- Evidence from procedural learning
Mariann M. Kiss, Dezső Németh, Karolina Janacsek·bioRxiv·May 27, 2019