henhaobio
Sign in

Communications ChemistryBiophysicsPeer-reviewed journal article

Transient Non-local Interactions Dominate the Dynamics of Measles Virus NTAIL

Lillian OttesoniD, Gábor NagyiD, John D. Kunkel, Gerdenis KodisiD, Lars V. BockiD, Christophe Bignon, Sonia LonghiiD, Wenwei ZhengiD, Helmut GrubmülleriD, Andrea C. VaianaiD, Sara M. VaianaiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

The RNA genome of measles virus is encapsidated by the nucleoprotein within a helical nucleocapsid that serves as template for both transcription and replication. The intrinsically disordered domain of the nucleoprotein (NTAIL), partly protruding outward from the nucleocapsid, is essential for binding the polymerase complex responsible for viral transcription and replication. As for many IDPs, binding of NTAIL occurs through a short molecular recognition element (MoRE) that folds upon binding, with the majority of NTAIL remaining disordered. Though NTAIL regions far from the MoRE influence the binding affinity, interactions between them and the MoRE have not been investigated in depth. Using an integrated approach, relying on photo-induced electron transfer (PET) experiments between tryptophan and cysteine pairs placed at different positions in the protein under varying salt and pH conditions, combined with simulations and analytical models, we identified transient interactions between two disordered regions distant in sequence, which dominate NTAIL dynamics, and regulate the conformational preferences of both the MoRE and the entire NTAIL domain. Co-evolutionary analysis corroborates our findings and suggests an important functional role for the same intramolecular interactions. We propose mechanisms by which these non-local interactions may regulate binding to the measles phosphoprotein, polymerase recruitment, and ultimately viral transcription and replication. Our findings may be extended to other IDPs, where non-local intra-protein interactions affect the conformational preferences of intermolecular binding sites.

Citations
4
FWCI
0.96
Field percentile
top 28%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.