Substitutions at Non-Conserved Rheostat Positions Modulate Function by Re-Wiring Long-Range, Dynamic Interactions

Abstract

Amino acid substitutions at nonconserved protein positions can have non-canonical and “long-distance” outcomes on protein function. Such outcomes might arise from changes in the internal protein communication network, which is often accompanied by changes in structural flexibility. To test this, we calculated flexibilities (“DFI”) and dynamic coupling (“DCI”) for positions in the linker region of the lactose repressor protein (“LacI”). This region contains nonconserved positions for which substitutions alter DNA binding affinity. We first chose to study eleven substitutions at position 52. In computations, substitutions showed long-range effects on flexibilities of DNA binding positions, and the degree of flexibility change correlated with experimentally-measured changes in DNA binding. Substitutions also altered dynamic coupling to DNA binding positions in a manner that captured other experimentally-determined functional changes. Next, we broadened calculations to consider the dynamic coupling between 17 linker positions and the DNA binding domain. Experimentally, these linker positions exhibited a wide range of substitution outcomes: Four conserved positions tolerated almost no substitutions (“toggle”), ten nonconserved positions showed progressive changes from a range of substitutions (“rheostat”), and three nonconserved positions tolerated almost all substitutions (“neutral”). In computations with wild-type LacI, the dynamic couplings between the DNA binding domain and these linker positions showed varied degrees of asymmetry that correlated with the observed toggle/rheostat/neutral substitution outcomes. Thus, we propose that long-range and non-canonical substitutions outcomes at nonconserved positions arise from re-wiring long-range communication among functionally-important positions. Such calculations might enable predictions for substitution outcomes at a range of nonconserved positions.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text