ACS OmegaBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Evaluating Limits of Machine Learning-Assisted Raman Spectroscopy in Classification of Biological Samples
Aman YadaviD, Arlin Birkby, Noah Armstrong, Assame ArnobiD, Ming-Hsun Chou, Alma Fernandez, Aart J. VerhoefiD, Zhenhuan YiiD, Siddhant GulatiiD, Siddhi KotnisiD, Qing Sun, Katy C. KaoiD, Hung‐Jen WuiD
Abstract
Machine learning (ML)-assisted Raman spectroscopy has become a powerful analytical tool for the classification and identification of analytes; however, technical challenges impacting its detection accuracy have not been investigated. This study explores experimental factors affecting classification performance. Among the evaluated ML models, ML algorithms show minimal impacts on classification accuracy. Instead, experimental factors, including spectral similarity between tested samples and the data quality, dominate detection performance. Increases in spectral noises and spectral similarity significantly reduce classification accuracy. In well-controlled samples with low experimental noise, ML-assisted Raman spectroscopy can discriminate lipid mixtures with a composition difference of 1.85 mol%. To assess the effect of biological heterogeneity, we analyzed single-cell Raman spectra from Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains carrying single, double, or triple gene mutations. Intrinsic cell-to-cell variability introduced substantial spectral differences, severely reducing the accuracy of multiclass classification of these genetically similar strains at the single-cell level. Averaging Raman spectra across multiple cells improved classification accuracy by reducing this spectral variability. We also assess the effectiveness of transfer learning across different Raman spectrometers, specifically by applying a ML model trained on one instrument to another Raman spectrometer. Transfer learning can be improved with proper instrument calibration, highlighting the importance of instrument standardization. Overall, our results demonstrate that data quality and spectral similarity are the primary bottlenecks in ML-assisted Raman spectroscopy. Careful attention to sample preparation, data acquisition, measurement conditions, and instrument calibration is critical to achieving robust and reliable classification performance.
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.74
- Field percentile
- top 8%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Deriving accurate molecular indicators of protein synthesis through Raman-based sparse classification
N. Pavillon, N. I. Smith·bioRxiv·Mar 2, 2021
- RamanMAE: Masked Autoencoders Enable Efficient Molecular Imaging by Learning Biologically Meaningful Spectral Representations
Santosh Kumar Paidi, Parul Maheshwari·Analytical ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Nov 21, 2025
- MSclassifR: an R package for supervised classification of mass spectra with machine learning methods
Alexandre Godmer, Yahia Benzerara, … Quentin Giai Gianetto·Expert Systems with ApplicationsPeer-reviewed·Jun 27, 2025
- Automated Raman micro-spectroscopy of epithelial cells for the high-throughput classification.
K. O'Dwyer, B. Hennelly, … K. Domijan·bioRxiv·Apr 23, 2021
- Label-Free Live Cell Type Prediction by Integrating Raman Spectroscopy and Machine Learning
Adrian Lita, Noor E Zannat, … Mioara Larion·bioRxiv·Jun 18, 2026
- Deep learning on reflectance confocal microscopy improves Raman spectral diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma
M. Chen, X. Feng, … J. W. Tunnell·bioRxiv·Mar 3, 2022