bioRxivMicrobiology
Direct PCR offers a fast and reliable alternative to conventional DNA isolation methods for animal gut microbiomes
E. Videvall, M. Strandh, A. Engelbrecht, S. Cloete, C. K. Cornwallis
Abstract
The gut microbiome of animals is emerging as an important factor influencing ecological and evolutionary processes. A major bottleneck in obtaining microbiome data from large numbers of samples is the time-consuming laboratory procedures, specifically the isolation of DNA and generation of amplicon libraries. Recently, direct PCR kits have been developed that circumvent conventional DNA extraction steps, thereby streamlining the laboratory process by reducing preparation time and costs. However, the reliability and efficacy of the direct PCR method for measuring host microbiomes has not yet been investigated other than in humans with 454-sequencing. Here, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the microbial communities obtained with direct PCR and the widely used MoBio PowerSoil DNA extraction kit in five distinct gut sample types (ileum - caecum - colon - faeces - cloaca) from 20 juvenile ostriches, using 16S rRNA Illumina MiSeq sequencing. We found that direct PCR was highly comparable over a range of measures to the DNA extraction method in caecal, colon, and faecal samples. However, the two methods recovered significantly different microbiomes in cloacal, and especially ileal samples. We also sequenced 100 replicate sample pairs to evaluate repeatability during both extraction and PCR stages, and found that both methods were highly consistent for caecal, colon, and faecal samples (rs > 0.7), but had low repeatability for cloacal (rs = 0.39) and ileal (rs = -0.24) samples. This study indicates that direct PCR provides a fast, cheap, and reliable alternative to conventional DNA extraction methods for retrieving 16S data, which will aid future gut microbiome studies of animals.
- organism: non-human primate
- assay: metagenomics
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A simple, cost-effective and automation-friendly direct PCR approach for bacterial community analysis
F. Song, J. V. Kuehl, … A. P. Arkin·bioRxiv·Mar 1, 2021
- Toward standards in clinical microbiome studies: comparison of three DNA extraction methods and two bioinformatic pipelines
Q. R. Ducarmon, B. B. V. H. Hornung, … R. D. Zwittink·bioRxiv·Aug 30, 2019
- Assessment of two DNA extraction kits for profiling poultry respiratory microbiota from multiple sample types
M. E. C. Abundo, J. Ngunjiri, … L. Chang-Won·bioRxiv·Oct 21, 2020
- A comparison of hard and soft direct methods for DNA extraction from soil
P. B. Hill, M. F. Dextraze, … C. N. Boddy·bioRxiv·Mar 7, 2022
- A low-cost pipeline for soil microbiome profiling
Anita Bollmann‐Giolai, Michael Giolai, … Matthew D. Clark·MicrobiologyOpenPeer-reviewed·Nov 22, 2020
- Measuring the gut microbiome in birds: comparison of faecal and cloacal sampling
E. Videvall, M. Strandh, … C. K. Cornwallis·bioRxiv·Jul 7, 2017