bioRxivMicrobiology
Assessment of two DNA extraction kits for profiling poultry respiratory microbiota from multiple sample types
M. E. C. Abundo, J. Ngunjiri, K. J. M. Taylor, H. Ji, A. Ghorbani, M. KC, B. P. Weber, T. J. Johnson, L. Chang-Won
Abstract
Characterization of poultry microbiota is becoming increasingly important due to the growing need for microbiome-based interventions to improve poultry health and production performance. However, the lack of standardized protocols for sampling, sample processing, DNA extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatic analysis can hinder data comparison between studies. Here, we investigated how the DNA extraction process affects microbial community compositions and diversity metrics in different chicken respiratory sample types including choanal and tracheal swabs, nasal cavity and tracheal washes, and lower respiratory lavage. We did a side-by-side comparison of the performances of Qiagen DNeasy blood and tissue (BT) and ZymoBIOMICS DNA Miniprep (ZB) kits. In general, samples extracted with the BT kit yielded higher concentrations of total DNA while those extracted with the ZB kit contained higher numbers of bacterial 16S rRNA gene copies per unit volume. Therefore, the samples were normalized to equal amounts of 16S rRNA gene copies prior to sequencing. For each sample type, all predominant taxa detected in samples extracted with one kit were present in replicate samples extracted with the other kit and did not show significant differences at the class level. Furthermore, between-kit differences in alpha and beta diversity metrics were statistically indistinguishable. Therefore, both kits perform similarly with regard to 16S rRNA gene-based poultry microbiome analysis.
- organism: chicken / avian
- assay: metagenomics
- research focus: ecology & biodiversity
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Toward standards in clinical microbiome studies: comparison of three DNA extraction methods and two bioinformatic pipelines
Q. R. Ducarmon, B. B. V. H. Hornung, … R. D. Zwittink·bioRxiv·Aug 30, 2019
- A comparison of six DNA extraction protocols for 16S, ITS, and shotgun metagenomic sequencing of microbial communities
J. P. Shaffer, C. S. Carpenter, … R. Knight·bioRxiv·Mar 7, 2022
- Direct PCR offers a fast and reliable alternative to conventional DNA isolation methods for animal gut microbiomes
E. Videvall, M. Strandh, … C. K. Cornwallis·bioRxiv·Sep 27, 2017
- Comparing DNA Extraction Protocols for Freshwater Prokaryotic Communities: Impacts on Yield and Microbial Profiling
Arthur Szylit, Ludwig E. Jardillier, … Urania Christaki·Peer Community JournalPeer-reviewed·Sep 18, 2026
- Optimizing Tissue Lysis and DNA Extraction Protocols to Enhance Bacterial Diversity Profiling in the Drosophila melanogaster Gut Microbiome
Carlos L. Quiñones-Sanchez, Jan L. Bilbao-Del Valle, … Imilce A. Rodriguez‐Fernandez·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jul 30, 2026
- Development of the duodenal, ileal, jejunal and caecal microbiota in chickens
L. Glendinning, K. A. Watson, M. Watson·bioRxiv·Sep 13, 2019