An internally controlled system to study microtubule network diversification links tubulin evolution to the use of distinct microtubule regulators
A. S. Kennard, K. B. Velle, R. Ranjan, D. Schulz, L. Fritz-Laylin
Abstract
Diverse eukaryotic cells assemble microtubule networks that vary in structure and composition. While we understand how cells build microtubule networks with specialized functions, we do not know how microtubule networks diversify across deep evolutionary timescales. This problem has remained unresolved because most organisms use shared pools of tubulins for multiple networks, making it impossible to trace the evolution of any single network. In contrast, the amoeboflagellate Naegleria uses distinct tubulin genes to build distinct microtubule networks: while Naegleria builds flagella from conserved tubulins during differentiation, it uses divergent tubulins to build its mitotic spindle. This genetic separation makes for an internally controlled system to study independent microtubule networks in a single organismal and genomic context. To explore the evolution of these microtubule networks, we identified conserved microtubule binding proteins and used transcriptional profiling of mitosis and differentiation to determine which are upregulated during the assembly of each network. Surprisingly, most microtubule binding proteins are upregulated during only one process, suggesting that Naegleria uses distinct component pools to specialize its microtubule networks. Furthermore, the divergent residues of mitotic tubulins tend to fall within the binding sites of differentiation-specific microtubule regulators, suggesting that interactions between microtubules and their binding proteins constrain tubulin sequence diversification. We therefore propose a model for cytoskeletal evolution in which pools of microtubule network components constrain and guide the diversification of the entire network, so that the evolution of tubulin is inextricably linked to that of its binding partners.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Kinetochore diversification in Naegleria reveals plasticity in the kinetochore-microtubule interface
Andrew S. Kennard, Emily M. Larkin, … Lillian K. Fritz‐Laylin·bioRxiv·Aug 19, 2026
- Naegleria's mitotic spindles are built from unique tubulins and highlight core spindle features
K. B. Velle, M. Trupinic, … P. Wadsworth·bioRxiv·Feb 23, 2021
- Effect of plant tubulin kinetic diversification on microtubule lengths
K. Jain, M. Roy, C. A. Athale·bioRxiv·May 11, 2021
- Microtubules form by progressively faster tubulin accretion, not by nucleation-elongation
L. Rice, M. Moritz, D. A. Agard·bioRxiv·Aug 18, 2020
- Phase separation of +TIP-networks regulates microtubule dynamics
J. Miesch, R. T. Wimbish, … C. Aumeier·bioRxiv·Sep 13, 2021
- Bacterial Microtubules Exhibit Polarized Growth, Mixed-Polarity Bundling, and Destabilization by GTP Hydrolysis
C. D. Diaz Celis, V. I. Risca, … O. Monasterio·bioRxiv·Mar 2, 2017