Communications BiologyGenetic & Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed journal article
Polygenic Risk Prediction using Gradient Boosted Trees Captures Non-Linear Genetic Effects and Allele Interactions in Complex Phenotypes
Michael ElgartiD, Genevieve Ray LyonsiD, Santiago Romero BrufauiD, Nuzulul KurniansyahiD, Jennifer A. BrodyiD, Xiuqing GuoiD, Henry J. LiniD, Laura M. RaffieldiD, Yan Lin GaoiD, Han CheniD, Paul S. de VriesiD, Donald M. Lloyd‐JonesiD, Leslie A. LangeiD, Gina Marie PelosoiD, Myriam FornageiD, Jerome I. RotteriD, Stephen S. RichiD, Alanna C. MorrisoniD, Bruce M. PsatyiD, Daniel A LevyiD, Susan S RedlineiD, Tamar SoferiD
Abstract
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are commonly used to quantify the inherited susceptibility for a given trait. However, the standard PRS fail to account for non-linear and interaction effects between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Machine learning algorithms can be used to account for such non-linearities and interactions. We trained and validated polygenic prediction models for five complex phenotypes in a multi-ancestry population: total cholesterol, triglycerides, systolic blood pressure, sleep duration, and height. We used an ensemble method of LASSO for feature selection and gradient boosted trees (XGBoost) for non-linearities and interaction effects. In an independent test set, we found that combining a standard PRS as a feature in the XGBoost model increases the percentage variance explained (PVE) of the prediction model compared to the standard PRS by 25% for sleep duration, 26% for height, 44% for systolic blood pressure, 64% for triglycerides, and 85% for total cholesterol. Machine learning models trained in specific racial/ethnic groups performed similarly in multi-ancestry trained models, despite smaller sample sizes. The predictions of the machine learning models were superior to the standard PRS in each of the racial/ethnic groups in our study. However, among Blacks the PVE was substantially lower than for other groups. For example, the PVE for total cholesterol was 8.1%, 12.9%, and 17.4% for Blacks, Whites, and Hispanics/Latinos, respectively. This work demonstrates an effective method to account for non-linearities and interaction effects in genetics-based prediction models.
- organism: human
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: polygenic risk
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 114
- FWCI
- 13.41
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Genetic Architecture and Sample Size Impact Relative Performance of Nonlinear Machine Learning and Standard Polygenic Risk Scores
Jingqi Zhu, Alexandra Baousi, … Hui Guo·medRxiv·Sep 3, 2026
- Boosting polygenic risk scores
Hannah Klinkhammer, Christian Staerk, … Andreas J. Mayr·Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 10, 2023
- Learning High-Order Interactions for Polygenic Risk Prediction
Michela Carlotta Massi, Nicola Rares Franco, … Paolo Zunino·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Feb 10, 2023
- Epistatic Features and Machine Learning Improve Alzheimer's Risk Prediction Over Polygenic Risk Scores
Stephen Hermes, Janet Cady, … The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·medRxiv·Feb 10, 2023
- Leveraging fine-mapping and non-European training data to improve cross-population polygenic risk scores
Omer Weissbrod, Masahiro Kanai, … Alkes L. Price·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2022
- A machine learning model for disease risk prediction by integrating genetic and non-genetic factors
Yu Gong Xu, Chonghao Wang, … Lu Zhang·IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)Peer-reviewed·Dec 6, 2022