Boosting polygenic risk scores
Hannah KlinkhammeriD, Christian StaerkiD, Carlo MajiD, Peter Michael KrawitziD, Andreas J. MayriD
Abstract
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) evaluate the individual genetic liability to a certain trait and are expected to play an increasingly important role in the field of clinical risk stratification. Most often, PRS are estimated based on summary statistics of univariate effects derived from genome-wide association studies. To improve the predictive performance of PRS, it is desirable to fit multivariable models directly on the genetic data. Due to the large and high-dimensional data, a direct application of existing methods is often not feasible and new efficient algorithms are required to overcome the computational burden regarding efficiency and memory demands. We develop an adapted component-wise L2-boosting algorithm to fit genotype data from large cohort studies to continuous outcomes using linear base-learners for the genetic variants. Similar to the snpnet approach implementing lasso regression, the proposed snpboost approach iteratively works on smaller batches of variants. By restricting the set of possible base-learners in each boosting step to variants most correlated with the residuals from previous iterations, the computational efficiency can be substantially increased without losing prediction accuracy. Furthermore, for large-scale data based on various traits from the UK Biobank we show that our method yields competitive prediction accuracy and computational efficiency compared to the snpnet approach. Due to the modular structure of boosting, our framework can be further extended to construct PRS for different outcome data and effect types.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 14
- FWCI
- 2.32
- Field percentile
- top 11%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Polygenic Prediction via Bayesian Regression and Continuous Shrinkage Priors
Tian Ge, Chia‐Yen Chen, … Jordan W. Smoller·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Apr 16, 2019
- Ensembled best subset selection using summary statistics for polygenic risk prediction
Tony Chen, Haoyu Zhang, … Xihong Lin·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Aug 7, 2024
- Efficient implementation of penalized regression for genetic risk prediction
Florian Privé, Hugues Aschard, Michaël G. B. Blum·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 26, 2019
- Significant Sparse Polygenic Risk Scores across 813 traits in UK Biobank
Yosuke Tanigawa, Junyang Qian, … Manuel A. Rivas·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 24, 2022
- A systematic framework for assessing the clinical impact of polygenic risk scores
Scott Kulm, Andrew R. Marderstein, … Olivier Elemento·medRxiv·Apr 6, 2020
- Polygenic Risk Prediction using Gradient Boosted Trees Captures Non-Linear Genetic Effects and Allele Interactions in Complex Phenotypes
Michael Elgart, Genevieve Ray Lyons, … Tamar Sofer·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 22, 2022