bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Distinct effects of priming the brain using tDCS and observational practice: new evidence from brain effective connectivity.
J. McLeod, A. Chavan, H. Lee, Sahar SattariiD, Simrut Kurry, Melissa A WakeiD, Zia Janmohamed, Nicola J. HodgesiD, Naznin Virji‐BabuliD
Abstract
Complex motor skills can be acquired while observing a model without physical practice. Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) applied to the primary motor cortex (M1) also facilitates motor learning. However, the effectiveness of observational practice for bimanual coordination skills is debated and there is little research on the effects of tDCS on acquiring bimanual skills and the underlying effective/causal brain connectivity. We compared the effect of primary motor cortex tDCS (M1-tDCS) to action-observation (AO) when acquiring a bimanual, two-ball juggling skill and characterized the brain causal connectivity patterns underlying each condition. Twenty healthy young adults with no juggling experience were randomly assigned to either video observation of a skilled juggler or anodal M1-tDCS. Thirty trials of juggling were performed and scored after the intervention. Resting-state EEG data were collected before and after the intervention. Information flow rate was applied to EEG source data to measure causal connectivity. Juggling scores were significantly higher in the AO group (p =.03). We found the strongest information exchange from (L) parietal to (R) parietal regions, strong bidirectional information exchange between (R) parietal and (R) occipital regions and an extensive network of activity that was (L) lateralized in the AO condition. In contrast, the M1-tDCS condition was characterized by bilateral long-range connections with the strongest information exchange from the (R) occipital region to the (R) temporal and (L) occipital regions. This study provides new results about the distinct network dynamics of priming the brain for skill acquisition using direct stimulation or indirect stimulation via action observation.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Timing of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at M1 Does Not Affect Motor Sequence Learning
Hakjoo Kim, Bradley R. King, … David L. Wright·HeliyonPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- Effects of tDCS on motor learning and memory formation: a consensus and critical position paper
Ethan R Buch, Emiliano Santarnecchi, … Leonardo G Cohen·bioRxiv·Jul 18, 2016
- Anodal M1 tDCS enhances online learning of rhythmic timing videogame skill
Anthony W. Meek, Davin Greenwell, … Zachary A. Riley·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jun 13, 2024
- Beneficial effects of cerebellar tDCS on motor learning are associated with altered putamen-cerebellar connectivity: a simultaneous tDCS-fMRI study
Matthias Liebrand, Anke Ninija Karabanov, … Elinor Tzvi·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Sep 9, 2020
- Neural mechanism underlying task-specific enhancement of motor learning by concurrent transcranial direct current stimulation
Ying Wang, Jixian Wang, … Yunqing Wen·Neuroscience BulletinPeer-reviewed·Jul 30, 2022
- Cooperation not competition: bihemispheric tDCS and fMRI show role for ipsilateral hemisphere in motor learning
Sheena Waters, Tobias Wiestler, Jörn Diedrichsen·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jul 3, 2017