Correcting values of DNA sequence similarity for errors in sequencing
Abstract
The similarity between two DNA sequences is one of the most important measures in bioinformatics, but errors introduced during sequencing make values of similarity lower than they should be. Here we develop a method to correct raw sequence similarity for sequencing errors and estimate the original sequence similarity. Our method is simple and consists of a single equation with terms for 1) raw sequence similarity and 2) error rates (e.g., from Phred quality scores). We show the importance of this correction for 16S ribosomal DNA sequences from bacterial communities, where 97% similarity is a frequent threshold for clustering sequences for analysis. At that threshold and typical error rate of 0.2%, correcting for error increases similarity by 0.36 percentage points. This result shows that, if uncorrected, sequencing error would increase similarity thresholds and generate false clusters for analysis. Our method could be used to adjust thresholds for cluster-based analyses. Alternatively, because it requires no clustering to correct sequence similarity, it could usher in a new age of analyzing ribosomal DNA sequences without clustering.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Accurate estimation of microbial diversity with Distanced
T. Hackmann·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2018
- Turn `noise' to signal: accurately rectify millions of erroneous short reads through graph learning on edit distances
Pengyao Ping, Shuquan Su, … Jinyan Li·bioRxiv·Apr 5, 2024
- Benchmarking of computational error-correction methods for next-generation sequencing data
Keith Mitchell, Jaqueline Brito, … Serghei Mangul·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 17, 2020
- UNOISE2: improved error-correction for Illumina 16S and ITS amplicon sequencing
R. C. Edgar·bioRxiv·Oct 15, 2016
- Sequencing accuracy and systematic errors of nanopore direct RNA sequencing
Wang Liu-Wei, Wiep van der Toorn, … Max von Kleist·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·May 28, 2024
- An error correction strategy for image reconstruction by DNA sequencing microscopy
Alexander Kloosterman, Igor Baars, Björn Högberg·Nature Computational SciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 22, 2024