bioRxivCell Biology
X-Chromosome Target Specificity Diverged Between Dosage Compensation Mechanisms of Two Closely Related Caenorhabditis Species
Q. Yang, T.-W. Lo, K. Brejc, C. Schartner, E. J. Ralston, D. M. Lapidus, B. J. Meyer
Abstract
An evolutionary perspective enhances our understanding of biological mechanisms. Comparison of sex determination and X-chromosome dosage compensation mechanisms between the closely related nematode species C. briggsae (Cbr) and C. elegans (Cel) revealed that the genetic regulatory hierarchy controlling both processes is conserved, but the X-chromosome target specificity and mode of binding for the specialized condensin dosage compensation complex (DCC) controlling X expression have diverged. We identified two motifs within Cbr DCC recruitment sites that are highly enriched on X: 13-bp MEX and 30-bp MEX II. Mutating either MEX or MEX II in an endogenous recruitment site with multiple copies of one or both motifs reduced binding, but only removing all motifs eliminated binding in vivo. Hence, DCC binding to Cbr recruitment sites appears additive. In contrast, DCC binding to Cel recruitment sites is synergistic: mutating even one motif in vivo eliminated binding. Although all X-chromosome motifs share the sequence CAGGG, they have otherwise diverged so that a motif from one species cannot function in the other. Functional divergence was demonstrated in vivo and in vitro. A single nucleotide position in Cbr MEX can determine whether Cel DCC binds. This rapid divergence of DCC target specificity could have been an important factor in establishing reproductive isolation between nematode species and contrasts dramatically with conservation of target specificity for X-chromosome dosage compensation across Drosophila species and for transcription factors controlling developmental processes such as body-plan specification from fruit flies to mice.
- organism: C. elegans
- assay: DNA methylation
- assay: ChIP-seq
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: chromatin & epigenetic regulation
- approach: experimental assay
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Parallel evolution of X chromosome-specific SMC complexes in two nematode lineages
Abraham Aharonoff, Jun Kim, … Sevinç Ercan·Molecular Biology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Oct 23, 2025
- Condensin IDC, H4K20me1, and perinuclear tethering maintain X chromosome repression in C. elegans
Jessica Trombley, Audry I. Rakozy, … Györgyi Csankovszki·bioRxiv·Apr 5, 2024
- Targeting of the dosage-compensated male X-chromosome during early Drosophila development
Leila E. Rieder, William T. Jordan, Erica Larschan·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2019
- Regulatory divergences in dosage compensation cause hybrid male inviability in Caenorhabditis
Yongbin Li, Yimeng Gao, … Xiao Liu·bioRxiv·Feb 6, 2024
- Structural Basis of Condensin Recruitment for X Chromosome Repression
Antonio Valdés, Gurumoorthy Amudhan, … Christian H. Haering·bioRxiv·Mar 15, 2026
- Structural basis for interaction between CLAMP and MSL2 proteins involved in the specific recruitment of the dosage compensation complex in Drosophila
Evgeniya Tikhonova, Sofia S. Mariasina, … Artem N. Bonchuk·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2022