Test Agreement Between Roche Cobas 6800 and Cepheid GeneXpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 Assays at High Cycle Threshold Ranges
K. J. Broder, A. Babiker, C. Myers, T. White, H. Jones, J. Cardella, E. M. Burd, C. E. Hill, C. S. Kraft
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has changed the face of the globe and upended the daily lives of billions. In an effort to bring mass-testing to as many as possible, multiple diagnostic tests including molecular, antigen detection and serological assays have been rapidly developed. However, there is very little information on positive test agreement across modalities, especially for lower viral loads. Thirty-five nasopharyngeal samples that had cycle threshold (Ct) values greater than 30.0 from the Roche cobas 6800 assay were run on the Cepheid GeneXpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay. Ct values ranged from 30.1 to 37.9 (mean 36.7 {+/-} 1.9) on the Roche cobas 6800 assay and 24.6 to 42.4 (mean 32.8{+/-}4.1) on the Cepheid assay. There was a bias of 0.33 {+/-} 3.21, (mean difference -1.59, 95% limits of agreement -5.97, 6.63) signifying close agreement between the 2 instruments with a high standard deviation. The close test agreement between the cobas 6800 and GeneXpert at high Ct values allows for utilization of both assays interchangeable in accordance with testing algorithms.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparison of Cepheid Xpert Xpress and Abbott ID Now to Roche cobas for the Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2
M. C. Smithgall, I. Scherberkova, … D. Green·bioRxiv·Apr 22, 2020
- Multicenter comparison of the Cobas 6800 system with the RealStar RT-PCR kit for the detection of SARS-CoV-2
M.-L. Chaix, M. Wirden, … B. Visseaux·bioRxiv·Jun 29, 2020
- Comparison of 12 molecular detection assays for SARS-CoV-2
Y. Matsumura, T. Shimizu, … M. Nagao·bioRxiv·Jun 24, 2020
- Validation and Comparison of a Modified CDC Assay with two Commercially Available Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Respiratory Specimen
A. Lima, V. Healer, … S. Silbert·bioRxiv·Jun 29, 2020
- Comparison of the NeuMoDX, Diasorin Simplexa, Cepheid and Roche CDC SARS-CoV 2 EUA assays using nasopharyngeal/nasal swabs in universal transport media (UTM) and sputum and tracheal aspirates
R. J. Tibbetts, K. Callahan, … L. P. Samuel·bioRxiv·May 26, 2020
- Comparison of the Accula SARS-CoV-2 Test with a Laboratory-Developed Assay for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Clinical Nasopharyngeal Specimens
C. A. Hogan, N. Garamani, … B. A. Pinsky·bioRxiv·May 12, 2020