Genome biologyBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Differential richness inference for 16S rRNA marker gene surveys
M. S. Binoj KumariD, ERIC V. SLUDiD, Christine HehnlyiD, Lijun ZhangiD, James Riley BroachiD, Rafael A. IrizarryiD, Steven J. SchiffiD, Joseph Nathaniel PaulsoniD
Abstract
Individual and environmental health outcomes are frequently linked to changes in the diversity of associated microbial communities. This makes deriving health indicators based on microbiome diversity measures essential. While microbiome data generated using high throughput 16S rRNA marker gene surveys are appealing for this purpose, 16S surveys also generate a plethora of spurious microbial taxa. When this artificial inflation in the observed number of taxa (i.e., richness, a diversity measure) is ignored, we find that changes in the abundance of detected taxa confound current methods for inferring differences in richness. Here we argue that the evidence of our own experiments, theory guided exploratory data analyses and existing literature, support the conclusion that most sub-genus discoveries are spurious artifacts of clustering 16S sequencing reads. We proceed based on this finding to model a 16S surveys systematic patterns of sub-genus taxa generation as a function of genus abundance to derive a robust control for false taxa accumulation. Such controls unlock classical regression approaches for highly flexible differential richness inference at various levels of the surveyed microbial assemblage: from sample groups to specific taxa collections. The proposed methodology for differential richness inference is available through an R package, Prokounter. Package availability: https://github.com/mskb01/prokounter
- Citations
- 8
- FWCI
- 0.65
- Field percentile
- top 39%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Longitudinal differential abundance analysis of microbial marker-gene surveys using smoothing splines
Joseph Nathaniel Paulson, Hisham Talukder, Héctor Corrada Bravo·bioRxiv·Jan 10, 2017
- Investigating Statistical Power of Differential Abundance Studies
Michael Agronah, Benjamin M. Bolker·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Apr 8, 2025
- Implications of taxonomic bias for microbial differential-abundance analysis
Michael R. McLaren, Jacob T. Nearing, … Benjamin J. Callahan·bioRxiv·Aug 19, 2022
- Microbiome differential abundance methods produce disturbingly different results across 38 datasets
Jacob T. Nearing, Gavin M. Douglas, … Morgan G. I. Langille·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jan 17, 2022
- Database size positively correlates with the loss of species-level taxonomic resolution for the 16S rRNA and other prokaryotic marker genes
Seth Commichaux, Tu Luan, … Mihai Pop·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 5, 2024
- Accurate Determination of Bacterial Abundances in Human Metagenomes Using Full-length 16S Sequencing Reads
Fanny Perraudeau, Sandrine Dudoit, James H. Bullard·bioRxiv·Dec 4, 2017