Common practice solvent extraction does not reflect actual emission of a sex pheromone during butterfly courtship
B. Visser, I. A. N. Dublon, S. Heuskin, F. Laval, P. M. B. Bacquet, G. Lognay, C. M. Nieberding
Abstract
Olfactory communication can be of critical importance for mate choice decisions. Lepidoptera are key model systems for understanding olfactory communication, particularly considering sex pheromone signaling in the context of sexual selection. Solvent extraction or rinsing of pheromone-producing structures is a widespread method for quantifying sex pheromones, but such measures reflect what is stored and may not represent what is actually emitted by an individual during courtship. Here, we address this point for the first time by quantifying the components of the male sex pheromone (MSP) of interacting Bicyclus anynana butterflies, a species for which much information is available onthe role played by MSPs in affecting mating success. Using headspace sampling during courtship and solvent extraction after completion of experiments using the same males, we were able to track individual traits. Our results show that solvent extracts do not reflect quantities of MSP components emitted by live butterflies. We further show that MSP amounts obtained using headspace sampling correlated with male mating success, but solvent extracts did not. Our results further strongly suggest that males actively control MSP emission when faced with increased male-male competition. Common practice solvent extracts may thus not serve as an adequate proxy for male sex pheromone signaling as they are perceived by choosy females. Our study serves as a proof of principle that quantification of male sex pheromone components depends on the method of collection, which could apply to many other insects using short-range chemical signals. This affects our understanding of how sexual selection shapes the evolution of sexually-selected chemical traits.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Male sex pheromone components in Heliconius butterflies released by the androconia affect female choice
Kathy Darragh, Sohini Vanjari, … Chris D. Jiggins·bioRxiv·Dec 2, 2015
- Males perceive honest information from female released sex pheromone in a moth
Y. Golov, A. Gonzalez-Karlsson, … A. Harari·bioRxiv·Apr 14, 2021
- Mosaic evolution of molecular pathways for sex pheromone communication in a butterfly
C. M. Nieberding, P. Beldade, … B. Visser·bioRxiv·Sep 4, 2020
- Individual variation in male pheromone production in Xylocopa sonorina correlates with size and gland color.
A. J. Goffinet, K. Darragh, … S. R. Ramirez·bioRxiv·Sep 27, 2023
- Early-exposure to new sex pheromone blend alters mate preference in female butterflies and in their offspring
E. Dion, L. X. Pui, A. Monteiro·bioRxiv·Nov 30, 2017
- Sex-determination cascade orchestrates male-male pheromone synthesis in the bean bug
Ji‐Chong Zhuo, Hai‐Qiang Wang, … Chuan-Xi Zhang·bioRxiv·Mar 11, 2026