medRxivGenetic & Genomic MedicinePreprint
Benchmarking and quality control for nanopore sequencing and feasibility of rapid genomics in New Zealand: validation phase at a single quaternary hospital
Denis M. NyagaiD, Peter TsaiiD, Clare GebbieiD, Hui Hui PhuaiD, Patrick YapiD, Polona Le Quesne StabejiD, Sophie L. FarrowiD, Jing Rong, Gergely ToldiiD, Eric B. ThorstenseniD, Zornitza StarkiD, Sebastian LunkeiD, Kimberley Gamet, Jodi Van Dyk, Mark GreensladeiD, Justin Martin O'SullivaniD
Abstract
Approximately 200 critically ill infants and children in New Zealand are in high-dependency neonatal/paediatric acute care at any given time, many with suspected genetic conditions, necessitating a scalable distributed solution for rapid genomic testing. We adopt the existing acute care genomics protocol of an accredited laboratory and established an expandable acute care clinical pipeline based around the Oxford Nanopore Technologies PromethION 2 solo system connected to a Bayesian AI-based clinical decision support tool (Fabric GEM software). In the establishment phase, we performed benchmarking using Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA4GH) benchmarking tools and Genome in a Bottle samples HG002-HG007. We evaluated single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small insertions-deletions (indels) calls and achieved SNV precision and recall of 0.997 {+/-} 0.0006 and 0.992 {+/-} 0.001, respectively. Small indel identification approached a precision of 0.922 {+/-} 0.019 and recall of 0.838 {+/-} 0.043. Rarefaction analyses demonstrated that SNV identification plateaus at [~]20X coverage, while small indels plateaus at [~]40X coverage. Large genomic variations from Coriell Copy Number Variation Reference Panel 1 (CNVPANEL01) were reliably detected with [~]2M long reads. Finally, we present results obtained from ten trio samples that were processed through the pipeline validation phase, averaging a 5-day turnaround time, conducted in parallel with a clinically accredited short-read rapid genomic testing pipeline.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: statistical model
- approach: benchmark study
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Optimised multiplex amplicon sequencing for mutation identification using the MinION nanopore sequencer
Whitney Whitford, Victoria Hawkins, … Jessie C. Jacobsen·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·May 20, 2022
- Assessing the readiness of Oxford Nanopore sequencing for clinical genomics applications
Judith Arres, Santosh Elavalli, … Javier Quilez·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2026
- High-Fidelity Nanopore Sequencing of Ultra-Short DNA Sequences
B. D. Wilson, M. Eisenstein, H. T. Soh·bioRxiv·Feb 16, 2019
- Nanopanel2 calls phased low-frequency variants in Nanopore panel sequencing data
Niko P. Popitsch, Sandra Preuner, Thomas Lion·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 15, 2021
- Rapid multiplex small DNA sequencing on the MinION nanopore sequencing platform
Shan Wei, Zachary R. Weiss, Zev Williams·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 15, 2018
- Analytical validity of nanopore sequencing for rapid SARS-CoV-2 genome analysis
Rowena Anne Bull, Thiruni N. Adikari, … Ira W. Deveson·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Dec 9, 2020