henhaobio
Sign in

medRxivGenetic & Genomic MedicinePreprint

Benchmarking and quality control for nanopore sequencing and feasibility of rapid genomics in New Zealand: validation phase at a single quaternary hospital

Denis M. NyagaiD, Peter TsaiiD, Clare GebbieiD, Hui Hui PhuaiD, Patrick YapiD, Polona Le Quesne StabejiD, Sophie L. FarrowiD, Jing Rong, Gergely ToldiiD, Eric B. ThorstenseniD, Zornitza StarkiD, Sebastian LunkeiD, Kimberley Gamet, Jodi Van Dyk, Mark GreensladeiD, Justin Martin O'SullivaniD

PDFDOI

Abstract

Approximately 200 critically ill infants and children in New Zealand are in high-dependency neonatal/paediatric acute care at any given time, many with suspected genetic conditions, necessitating a scalable distributed solution for rapid genomic testing. We adopt the existing acute care genomics protocol of an accredited laboratory and established an expandable acute care clinical pipeline based around the Oxford Nanopore Technologies PromethION 2 solo system connected to a Bayesian AI-based clinical decision support tool (Fabric GEM software). In the establishment phase, we performed benchmarking using Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA4GH) benchmarking tools and Genome in a Bottle samples HG002-HG007. We evaluated single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small insertions-deletions (indels) calls and achieved SNV precision and recall of 0.997 {+/-} 0.0006 and 0.992 {+/-} 0.001, respectively. Small indel identification approached a precision of 0.922 {+/-} 0.019 and recall of 0.838 {+/-} 0.043. Rarefaction analyses demonstrated that SNV identification plateaus at [~]20X coverage, while small indels plateaus at [~]40X coverage. Large genomic variations from Coriell Copy Number Variation Reference Panel 1 (CNVPANEL01) were reliably detected with [~]2M long reads. Finally, we present results obtained from ten trio samples that were processed through the pipeline validation phase, averaging a 5-day turnaround time, conducted in parallel with a clinically accredited short-read rapid genomic testing pipeline.

Citations
0

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISWhitford '22Arres '26Wilson '19Popitsch '21Wei '18Bull '20
62% semantic matchBioinformatics
Whitney Whitford, Victoria Hawkins, Kriebashne S. Moodley+4 more·Scientific Reports·May 20, 2022· 48 citations