henhaobio
Sign in

PLoS Computational BiologySystems BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article

COBRAme: A Computational Framework for Models of Metabolism and Gene Expression

Colton J. LloydiD, Ali EbrahimiD, Laurence YangiD, Zachary A. KingiD, Edward CatoiuiD, Edward J. O’Brien, Joanne K. LiuiD, Bernhard Ørn PalssoniD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Genome-scale models of metabolism and macromolecular expression (ME-models) explicitly compute the optimal proteome composition of a growing cell. ME-models expand upon the well-established genome-scale models of metabolism (M-models), and they enable new and exciting insights that are fundamental to understanding the basis of cellular growth. ME-models have increased predictive capabilities and accuracy due to their inclusion of the biosynthetic costs for the machinery of life, but they come with a significant increase in model size and complexity. This challenge results in models which are both difficult to compute and challenging to understand conceptually. As a result, ME-models exist for only two organisms (Escherichia coli and Thermotoga maritima) and are still used by relatively few researchers. To address these challenges, we have developed a new software framework called COBRAme for building and simulating ME-models. It is coded in Python and built on COBRApy, a popular platform for using M-models. COBRAme streamlines computation and analysis of ME-models. It provides tools to simplify constructing and editing ME-models to enable ME-model reconstructions for new organisms. We used COBRAme to reconstruct a condensed E. coli ME-model called iJL1678b-ME. This reformulated model gives virtually identical solutions to previous E. coli ME-models while using [1/4] the number of free variables and solving in less than 10 minutes, a marked improvement over the 6 hour solve time of previous ME-model formulations. This manuscript outlines the architecture of COBRAme and demonstrates how ME-models can be reconstructed and edited most efficiently using the software.

Citations
167
FWCI
7.29
Field percentile
top 2%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISLloyd '21Machado '18Yang '19Baghdassari '26Kratochvíl '21King '16
66% semantic matchSystems Biology
Colton J. Lloyd, Jonathan M. Monk, Laurence Yang+2 more·PLoS Computational Biology·Jun 23, 2021· 11 citations