henhaobio
Sign in

medRxivGenetic & Genomic MedicinePreprint

Concordance of whole-genome amplified embryonic DNA with the subsequently born child

Shenglai LiiD, Thomas Giardina, Maria Katz, Dhruva ChandramohaniD, Robert Nathan Slotnick, Barry R. Behr, Noor Siddiqui, Yuntao XiaiD, Benjamin PodgurskyiD

PDFDOI
Citations
4

Abstract

Before implantation subsequent to in vitro fertilization (IVF), the current options for Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) are PGT for Aneuploidy (PGT-A) and, if clinically indicated, PGT for monogenic conditions (PGT-M). A more comprehensive approach involves PGT whole genome sequencing (PGT-WGS). PGT-WGS incorporates PGT-A, screens for hundreds of monogenic conditions, and can evaluate polygenic risk. Here we compare PGT-WGS results against the genome of the subsequently born child. We demonstrated high levels of concordance (both in sensitivity and precision) in exome variant calls between amplified embryonic DNA and sequenced fetal cord blood. This concordance was higher when filtering against 1300 targeted monogenic conditions implicated in birth defects, neurodevelopmental disorders, and hereditary cancer. To evaluate PGT-WGSs ability to identify de novo variants we compared the childs genome to parental genomes and demonstrated that PGT-WGS successfully identified 5/5 confirmed de-novo variants. We further demonstrated concordance in polygenic risk scores calculated for both the embryo and the subsequently born child. This agreement extended to both traditional polygenic scores and oligogenic scores (Type 1 diabetes, Celiac disease, and Alzheimers Disease), which heavily rely on accurate genotyping of HLA and APOE sites. To our knowledge, this is the first direct concordance study between a whole-genome sequencing of a trophectoderm biopsy and the DNA of the subsequently born child. By demonstrating a high degree of whole-exome concordance and adept detection of de novo variants, this approach showcases PGT-WGSs capability to identify genetic variants not explicitly targeted for monogenic screening.

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.