Benchmarking Large Language Models for Predictive Modeling in Biomedical Research With a Focus on Reproductive Health
Reuben D. SarwaliD, Victor Tarca, Claire A. DubiniD, Nikolaos KalavrosiD, Gaurav BhattiiD, Sanchita BhattacharyaiD, Atul Janardhan ButteiD, Roberto Romero, Gustavo A. StolovitzkyiD, Tomiko OskotskyiD, Adi Laurentiu TarcaiD, Marina SirotaiD
Abstract
Generative AI, particularly large language models (LLMs), is increasingly being used in computational biology to support code generation for data analysis. In this study, we evaluated the ability of LLMs to generate functional R and Python code for predictive modeling tasks, leveraging standardized molecular datasets from several recent DREAM (Dialogue for Reverse Engineering Assessments and Methods) Challenges focused on reproductive health. We assessed LLM performance across four predictive tasks derived from three DREAM challenges: gestational age regression from gene expression, gestational age regression from DNA methylation profiles, and classification of preterm birth and early preterm birth from microbiome data. LLMs were prompted with task descriptions, data locations, and target outcomes. LLM-generated code was then run to fit and apply prediction models and generate graphics, and they were ranked based on their success in completing the tasks and achieving strong test set performance. Among the eight LLMs tested, o3-mini-high, 4o, DeepseekR1 and Gemini 2.0 completed at least one task without error. Overall, R code generation was more successful (14/16 tasks) than Python (7/16), attributed to the utility of Bioconductor packages for querying Gene Expression Omnibus data. OpenAIs o3-mini-high outperformed others, completing 7/8 tasks. Test set performance of the top LLM matched or exceeded top-performing teams from the original DREAM challenges. These findings underscore the potential of LLMs to enhance exploratory analysis and democratize access to predictive modeling in omics by automating key components of analysis pipelines, and highlight the potential to increase research output when conducting analyses of standardized datasets from public repositories.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.90
- Field percentile
- top 5%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Leveraging large language models for data analysis automation
Jacqueline A. Jansen, Artür Manukyan, … Altuna Akalin·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Feb 21, 2025
- Benchmarking Large Language Models for Bio-Image Analysis Code Generation
Robert Haase, Christian Tischer, … Nico Scherf·bioRxiv·Apr 19, 2024
- A benchmark for large language models in bioinformatics
Varuni Sarwal, Gaia Andreoletti, … Serghei Mangul·bioRxiv·Dec 19, 2023
- Evaluating large language models in biomedical data science challenges through a classroom experiment
Huifang Ma, Zhicheng Ji, … Y. Zhang·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Dec 11, 2025
- Out-of-the-box bioinformatics capabilities of large language models (LLMs)
Varsha Rajesh, Maceo Blumberg, … Geoffrey Siwo·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 29, 2026
- Accelerating Drug Repurposing with AI: The Role of Large Language Models in Hypothesis Validation
Iratxe Zunzunegui Sanz, Belén Otero-Carrasco, Alejandro Rodríguez‐González·Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical SystemsPeer-reviewed·Jun 18, 2025