Braess' Paradox in Enzyme Kinetics: Asymmetry from Population Balance without Direct Cooperativity
Malte SchäffneriD, Colin A. SmithiD, Robert TampéiD, Helmut GrubmülleriD
Abstract
The ATPase ABCE1, a member of the ubiquitous ATP-Binding Cassette protein superfamily, is essential in eukaryotic and archaeal ribosome recycling. It comprises a pair of homologous nucleotide-binding domains each containing a consensus nucleotide-binding site (NBS), where ATP hydrolysis takes place. Each of these sites can be either in an open or closed conformation. Despite this near symmetry, and quite unexpectedly, their hydrolysis kinetics are highly asymmetric. While substitution of the catalytic glutamate (E238Q) in NBSI reduced the overall turnover rate of the ATPase by a factor of two, as one might expect, the corresponding substitution in NBSII (E485Q) shows a so far unexplained tenfold increase. To address this issue, we used Markov models to study how such drastic asymmetry can arise. Specifically, we asked if previously proposed direct allosteric interaction between the two nucleotide-binding sites, such as electrostatic interactions, are required to explain this observation. Indeed, using a Bayesian approach, we found Markov models that quantitatively predict the experimentally observed kinetics as well as additional steady state ATP occupancy data without such direct allosteric interaction. In particular, our results show that the structure-induced property that opening and closing always involves both nucleotide-binding sites suffices to explain the observed remarkable asymmetry. These models can explain the unexpected fast kinetics of the mutant of NBSII in terms of a drastic population shift due to the mutation, which circumvents a kinetic trap state that slows down wild-type kinetics. Our Baysian Markov approach may help to quantitatively explain similar non-intuitive Braess-type kinetics also in other enzymes where chemical/conformation coupling is essential.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 6th percentile
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Kinetic asymmetry drives directionality in an ATP-binding cassette transporter
Michael Rudolph, Hossein Batebi, … Benesh Joseph·bioRxiv·Sep 12, 2026
- Allosteric communication between ligand binding domains modulates substrate inhibition in adenylate kinase
D. Scheerer, B. V. Adkar, … E. Shakhnovich·bioRxiv·Nov 21, 2022
- Kinetic asymmetry drives kinesin-1's unidirectional and processive movement
Hiroshi Isojima, Kohei Matsuzaki, Michio Tomishige·bioRxiv·Jun 11, 2025
- Plus and minus ends of microtubule respond asymmetrically to kinesin binding by a long range directionally driven allosteric mechanism
H. T. Vu, Z. Zhang, … D. Thirumalai·bioRxiv·Aug 30, 2021
- Asymmetry and Allostery: Insights into the Mechanism of DirectionalPeptide Translocation in AAA+ Unfoldases
Tyler G. Southam, Myongin Oh, Jessica M. J. Swanson·bioRxiv·Jul 29, 2026
- Conformational Barrier-Driven Flux Redistribution across Competing Catalytic Pathways Unifies Diverse Enzyme Kinetic Regimes
Rohon Mitra, Biman Jana·bioRxiv·Sep 23, 2026