bioRxivGeneticsPreprint
Sequence sensitivity of open chromatin reveals constrained regulatory elements underlying human traits
Kohei TomizukaiD, Masaru KoidoiD, Akari SuzukiiD, Soichiro Yoshino, Nao TanakaiD, Yuki IshikawaiD, Xiaoxi LiuiD, Satoshi KoyamaiD, Kazuyoshi IshigakiiD, Yasuhiro MurakawaiD, Kazuhiko YamamotoiD, Chikashi C. TeraoiD
Abstract
Open chromatin regions (OCRs) delineate cell-type-specific regulatory landscapes across the genome, yet their functional importance varies considerably. Here, we introduce CAMBUS (Chromatin Accessibility Mutation Burden Score), a machine-learning framework that quantifies the sensitivity of predicted chromatin accessibility to sequence perturbation to prioritize functionally important OCRs. Applying CAMBUS to 29 immune cell types, we identified 66,043 CAMBUS-defined OCRs (cOCRs), without directly incorporating human genetic variation or existing evolutionary constraint metrics. Nevertheless, cOCRs were strongly enriched in independently defined constrained regions (odds ratio (OR)=11.45 (95% confidence interval (CI) 9.33-14.05), P=4.7 x 10-68), and active regulatory elements, with enrichment for super-enhancers remaining after adjustment for established constraint metrics and sequence features (OR=6.18 (95% CI 3.80-10.05), P=2.1 x 10-13). cOCRs also showed cell-type-specific enrichment for the heritability of immune-mediated diseases and for putative causal variants identified by statistical fine-mapping across European and East Asian ancestries, including rare variants. Integration with statistical fine-mapping further linked 1,533 putative causal variants across 70 complex traits to cell-type-specific cOCRs, revealing plausible regulatory mechanisms underlying complex traits. Together, CAMBUS provides a region-centered framework for identifying regulatory elements whose predicted activity is sensitive to sequence disruption and that are enriched for evolutionary constraint, complementing existing regulatory and constraint annotations for interpreting non-coding genetic variation.
- organism: human
- assay: ChIP-seq
- research focus: chromatin & epigenetic regulation
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: GWAS / association mapping
- research focus: fine-mapping
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A cell atlas of chromatin accessibility across 25 adult human tissues
Kai Zhang, James D. Hocker, … Bing Ren·CellPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2021
- OCHROdb: a comprehensive, quality checked database of open chromatin regions from sequencing data
Parisa Shooshtari, Samantha Feng, … Chris J. Cotsapas·bioRxiv·Dec 3, 2018
- Multi-enhancer regulatory hubs control Th17 cell identity
Keith Siklenka, Chuangchuang Zhang, … Timothy E. Reddy·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2026
- Genetic regulation of cell type-specific chromatin accessibility shapes immune function and disease risk
Angli Xue, Jianan Fan, … Joseph E. Powell·medRxiv·Aug 27, 2025
- Genetic regulation of cell-type specific chromatin accessibility shapes the etiology of brain diseases
Biao Zeng, Jaroslav M. Bendl, … Panos Roussos·SciencePeer-reviewed·May 23, 2024
- Genotype inference from aggregated chromatin accessibility data reveals genetic regulatory mechanisms
Brandon M. Wenz, Yuan He, … Alexis J. Battle·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 30, 2025