Spatial and temporal signatures of cell competition revealed by K-function analysis
Nathan J. DayiD, Jasmine Michalowska, Manasi KelkariD, Giulia VallardiiD, Guillaume CharrasiD, Alan R. LoweiD
Abstract
It is generally hypothesised that in MDCK wild-type versus ScrKD co-cultures mechanical competition leads to the physical elimination of ScrKD cells, while in MDCK wild-type versus RasV12 co-cultures biochemical competition results in the non-apoptotic extrusion of RasV12 cells. However, the exact spatiotemporal signatures of competitive interactions in these systems remains largely unknown. Utilising advanced single-cell image analysis, this research quantifies the spatiotemporal dynamics of these competitive interactions. Time-lapse microscopy, combined with cellular segmentation, tracking, cell-state classification, and K-function clustering analysis provide detailed insights into how wild-type cell proliferation relates to the elimination of mutant cells. We find striking differences in the underlying processes of each competition type. In the ScrKD competition, elimination seems driven by diffuse proliferative forces unrelated to the immediate elimination site. In contrast, RasV12 cell elimination is closely linked to local increases in wild-type cell mitoses prior to the RasV12 extrusion. Both competitions trigger an increase in local wild-type cell proliferation post-elimination, although the timing of these responses vary. This study not only sheds light on the diverse mechanisms of cell competition but also underscores the complexity of cellular interactions in tissue dynamics, providing new perspectives on cellular quality control and a new quantitative approach to characterise these interactions.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.35
- Field percentile
- 47th percentile
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Cell-scale biophysical determinants of cell competition in epithelia
D. Gradeci, A. Bove, … G. Charras·bioRxiv·Mar 19, 2021
- Force transmission is a master regulator of mechanical cell competition
Andreas Schoenit, Siavash Monfared, … Benoît Ladoux·Nature MaterialsPeer-reviewed·Mar 14, 2025
- Myc-induced cell mixing is required for competitive tissue invasion and destruction
Eduardo Moreno, Romain Levayer, Barbara Hauert·NaturePeer-reviewed·Aug 19, 2015
- Interfacial tension and growth both contribute to mechanical cell competition
Léo Valon, Alexis Matamoro‐Vidal, … Romain Levayer·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 10, 2025
- Physical traits of supercompetitors in cell competition
Logan C. Carpenter, Shiladitya Banerjee·Journal of The Royal Society InterfacePeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2025
- A mathematical framework for the emergence of winners and losers in cell competition
Thomas F. Pak, Joe Pitt‐Francis, Ruth E. Baker·Journal of Theoretical BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 11, 2023