Sign in
GeneticsHuman Genetics
Peer-reviewed journal article

Novel Loss-of-Function Mutations in COCH Cause Autosomal Recessive Nonsyndromic Deafness

Kevin T. A. BoothiD, Amama Ghaffar, Muhammad RashidiD, L HoveyiD, Mureed HussainiD, Kathy L. Frees, Erika M RenkesiD, Carla J. Nishimura, Mohsin ShahzadiD, Richard J. SmithiD, Zubair M. AhmediD, Héla AzaieziD, Saima RiazuddiniD

Abstract

COCH is the most abundantly expressed gene in the cochlea. Unsurprisingly, mutations in COCH underly deafness in mice and humans. Two forms of deafness are linked to mutations in COCH, the well-established autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss, with or without vestibular dysfunction (DFNA9) via a gain-of-function/dominant-negative mechanism, and more recently autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss (DFNB110) via nonsense variants. Using a combination of targeted gene panels, exome sequencing and functional studies, we identified four novel pathogenic variants (two nonsense variants, one missense and one inframe deletion) in COCH as the cause of autosomal recessive hearing loss in a multi-ethnic cohort. To investigate whether the non-truncating variants exert their effect via a loss-of-function mechanism, we used mini-gene splicing assays. Our data showed both the missense and inframe deletion variants altered RNA-splicing by creating an exon splicing silencer and abolishing an exon splicing enhancer, respectively. Both variants create frameshifts and are predicted to result in a null allele. This study confirms the involvement of loss-of-function mutations in COCH in autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss, expands the mutational landscape of DFNB110 to include coding variants that alter RNA-splicing, and highlights the need to investigate the effect of coding variants on RNA-splicing.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
21
FWCI
1.41
Field percentile
top 15%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISDanial‐Farr '20Vrieze '20Salazar‐Sil '20Zhang '20Morell '20Redfield '24
80% semantic matchGenetics
Nada Danial‐Farran, Elena Chervinsky, Prathamesh T. Nadar‐Ponniah+5 more·European Journal of Human Genetics·Sep 16, 2020· 13 citations