More Research Needed: There is a Robust Causal vs. Confounding Problem for Intelligence-associated Polygenic Scores in Context to Admixed American Populations.
Bryan J. PestaiD, John G. R. FuerstiD, Davide PifferiD, Emil O. W. KirkegaardiD
Abstract
Polygenic scores for educational attainment and intelligence (eduPGS), genetic ancestry, and cognitive ability have been found to be inter-correlated in some admixed American populations. We argue that this could either be due to causally-relevant genetic differences between ancestral groups or be due to population stratification-related confounding. Moreover, we argue that it is important to determine which scenario is the case so to better assess the validity of eduPGS. We investigate the confounding vs. causal concern by examining, in detail, the relation between eduPGS, ancestry, and general cognitive ability in East Coast Hispanic and non-Hispanic samples. European ancestry was correlated with g in the admixed Hispanic (r = .30, N = 506), European-African (r = .26, N = 228), and African (r = .084, N = 2,179) American samples. Among Hispanics and the combined sample, these associations were robust to controls for racial / ethnic self-identification, genetically predicted color, and parental education. Additionally, eduPGS predicted g among Hispanics (B = 0.175, N = 506) and all other groups (European: B = 0.230, N = 4914; European-African: B = 0.215, N = 228; African: B = 0.126, N = 2179) with controls for ancestry. Path analyses revealed that eduPGS, but not color, partially statistically explained the association between g and European ancestry among both Hispanics and the combined sample. Of additional note, we were unable to account for eduPGS differences between ancestral populations using common tests for ascertainment bias and confounding related to population stratification. Overall, our results suggest that eduPGS derived from European samples can be used to predict g in American populations. However, owing to the uncertain cause of the differences in eduPGS, it is not yet clear how the effect of ancestry should be handled. We argue that more research is needed to determine the source of the relation between eduPGS, genetic ancestry, and cognitive ability.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Testing for differences in polygenic scores in the presence of confounding
Jennifer Blanc, Jeremy J. Berg·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 15, 2025
- Genetic effects on educational attainment in Hungary
Péter P. Ujma, Nóra Eszlári, … Gabriella Juhász·Brain and BehaviorPeer-reviewed·Nov 29, 2021
- A Litmus Test for Confounding in Polygenic Scores
Samuel Pattillo Smith, Olivia S. Smith, … Arbel Harpak·bioRxiv·Feb 1, 2025
- Theoretical and empirical quantification of the accuracy of polygenic scores in ancestry divergent populations
Ying Wang, Jing Guo, … Loïc Yengo·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jul 31, 2020
- Polygenic Scores for Cognitive Abilities and their Association with Different Aspects of General Intelligence - a Deep Phenotyping Approach
Erhan Genç, Caroline Schlüter, … Sebastian Ocklenburg·Molecular NeurobiologyPeer-reviewed·May 5, 2021
- Educational Attainment Polygenic Scores, Socioeconomic Factors, and Cortical Structure in Children and Adolescents
Emily C. Merz, Jordan Strack, … Budhachandra S. Khundrakpam·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Jul 27, 2022