Detection of prostate cancer in 3D pathology datasets via generative immunolabeling
Robert SerafiniD, Jennifer Salguero LópeziD, SP Chow, Rui WangiD, Yujie ZhaoiD, Elena BaraznenokiD, Lydia Lan, Kevin W. BishopiD, Michelle R. DownesiD, Xavier FarréiD, Lawrence D. TrueiD, Priti LaliD, Anant MadabhushiiD, Jonathan T.C. LiuiD
Abstract
Recent advancements in nondestructive 3D pathology offer a complement to standard histology by enabling comprehensive volumetric analyses of intact clinical specimens (e.g. biopsies). Prior studies have demonstrated the added prognostic value of 3D pathology for prostate cancer risk stratification by correlating 3D microarchitectural features with long-term patient outcomes. However, these analyses relied on coarse manual annotations of cancer-enriched regions for downstream analysis without fine-grained delineation between often-intermixed cancerous and benign glands. To address these limitations, we have developed a 3D computational pipeline: Synthetic Immunolabeling for Generative Heatmaps of Tumor (SIGHT). SIGHT relies on deep learning-based 3D image translation models, trained in a fully supervised fashion, to convert H&E-analog 3D pathology datasets into multiplexed 3D immunofluorescence datasets that facilitate tumor detection. Our implementation of SIGHT synthetically labels two cytokeratin markers that are differentially expressed in cancerous and benign prostate glands, which are used to generate explainable 3D heatmaps of cancer-enriched regions in prostate tissues. Validation of SIGHT against ground-truth annotations from a panel of genitourinary pathologists yields an average F1 score of 0.88 which is comparable to the average inter-pathologist agreement F1 score of 0.90. To demonstrate the value of SIGHT, we developed machine classifiers of recurrence risk based on 3D glandular histomorphometric features from 75 patients. Volumetric glandular analysis in SIGHT-identified cancer-enriched regions vs. all tissue regions yields an average Kaplan-Meier hazard ratio of 3.57 (1.6 - 7.9 CI) vs. 0.92 (0.45 - 1.89 CI).
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Field percentile
- top 11%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- An AI-assisted Tool For Efficient Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
M. U. Oner, M. Y. Ng, … H. K. Lee·bioRxiv·Feb 6, 2022
- Deep Learning on Multimodal Chemical and Whole Slide Imaging Data for Predicting Prostate Cancer Directly from Tissue Images
M. I. U. Haque, D. Mukherjee, … O. Ovchinnikova·bioRxiv·May 11, 2022
- Multi-Scale Tri-Modal Histology Dataset Integrating Tumor Morphology, Immune Patterns, and Clinical Outcomes
Kyeong Joo Jung, Jianwei Qiu, … Parag Mallick·bioRxiv·May 19, 2026
- Automatic Classification of Prostate Cancer Gleason Scores from Digitized Whole Slide Tissue Biopsies
Hongming Xu, Sunho Park, Tae Hyun Hwang·bioRxiv·May 9, 2018
- Automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer tissue microarrays via deep learning
Eirini Arvaniti, Kim S. Fricker, … Manfred Claassen·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Aug 7, 2018
- Shedding Light on the Black Box of a Neural Network Used to Detect Prostate Cancer in Whole Slide Images by Occlusion-Based Explainability
V. Krajnansky, M. Gallo, … T. Brazdil·bioRxiv·Mar 31, 2022