Rare genetic variants influence participation in cognitive components of the UK Biobank
Eilidh FenneriD, Peter HolmansiD, Michael C. O’DonovaniD, Michael John OweniD, Elliott ReesiD, James TR WaltersiD
Abstract
Population-level biobanks are transforming health and genomic research however they are all subject to recruitment and participation biases, the impacts of which are not fully understood. The UK Biobank (UKBB) is one such cohort; it is widely used for health-related research, but its participants are not representative of the UK general population. In addition, those who complete optional components of UKBB differ from those who do not in terms of health-related exposures and outcomes. Participation in UKBB has a partly genetic basis, but the extent to which rare variants influence participation in optional study components, and how this might impact findings of rare variant association studies, is unknown. We analysed exome sequencing and array data from 398,149 UKBB participants to examine rare variant contributions to UKBB participation bias, focusing on cognitive phenotypes. We found that classes of rare variation previously shown to contribute to cognition were enriched among participants who completed fewer cognitive tests. We then compared the effects of rare variants on cognition itself between groups of participants defined by whether they completed all online cognitive tests. Rare variants had significantly weaker effects on cognition in individuals who completed all online cognitive tests than in those who did not. These findings demonstrate that participation is a non-random phenotype that is influenced by rare variants, and that individuals who engage in optional UKBB components are not representative of the broader cohort. We show how participation bias can reduce the power of rare variant association studies, potentially masking true associations. This bias should therefore be carefully considered when interpreting results derived from phenotypes with substantial missingness.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Genetic predictors of participation in optional components of UK Biobank
Jessica Tyrrell, Jie Zheng, … Kate M. Tilling·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Feb 9, 2021
- Rare coding variants in schizophrenia-associated genes affect generalised cognition in the UK Biobank
Eilidh Fenner, Peter Holmans, … Elliott Rees·Molecular PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Apr 10, 2026
- Surveying the contribution of rare variants to the genetic architecture of human disease through exome sequencing of 177,882 UK Biobank participants
Quanli Wang, Ryan S. Dhindsa, … AstraZeneca Genomics Initiative·bioRxiv·Dec 13, 2020
- Correction for participation bias in the UK Biobank reveals non-negligible impact on genetic associations and downstream analyses
Tabea Schoeler, Doug Speed, … Zoltán Kutalik·Nature Human BehaviourPeer-reviewed·Apr 27, 2023
- The impact of rare protein coding genetic variation on adult cognitive function
Chia‐Yen Chen, Ruoyu Tian, … Heiko Runz·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 25, 2023
- Systematic single-variant and gene-based association testing of thousands of phenotypes in 426,370 UK Biobank exomes
Konrad J. Karczewski, Matthew Solomonson, … Benjamin M. Neale·Cell GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Aug 15, 2022