Comparison of rule- and ordinary differential equation-based dynamic model of DARPP-32 signalling network
Emilia WysockaiD, Matthew Page, James SnowdeniD, T. Ian SimpsoniD
Abstract
Dynamic modelling has considerably improved our understanding of complex molecular mechanisms. Ordinary differential equations (ODEs) are the most detailed and popular approach to modelling the dynamics of molecular systems. However, their application in signalling networks, characterised by multi-state molecular complexes, can be prohibitive. Contemporary modelling methods, such as rule-based (RB) modelling, have addressed these issues. The advantages of RB modelling over ODEs have been presented and discussed in numerous reviews. In this study, we conduct a direct comparison of the time courses of a molecular system founded on the same reaction network but encoded in the two frameworks. To make such a comparison, a set of reactions that underlie an ODE model was manually encoded in the Kappa language, one of the RB implementations. A comparison of the models was performed at the level of model specification and results were acquired through model simulations. Conforming to previous reports, we confirm that the Kappa model recapitulated the general dynamics of its ODE counterpart with minor differences. These differences occur whenever molecules have multiple sites binding the same interactor. Furthermore, activation of these molecules in the RB model is slower than in the ODE one but can be corrected by revision of the rate constants used in the relevant rules. As in previous reports on other molecular systems, we find that, also in the case of the DARPP-32 reaction network, the RB representation offers a more expressive and flexible syntax that facilitates access to fine details of the model, facilitating model reuse. In parallel with these analyses, this manuscript reports a refactored model of the DARPP-32 interaction network that can serve as a canvas for the development of a more complex interaction network to study this important molecular system.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.16
- Field percentile
- 38th percentile
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Dynamic modelling of signalling pathways when ODEsare not feasible
Timo Rachel, Eva Brombacher, … Clemens Kreutz·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 13, 2024
- A Toolbox for Discrete Modelling of Cell Signalling Dynamics
Yasmin Z. Paterson, David Shorthouse, … Jasmin Fisher·Integrative BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2018
- Benchmark Problems for Dynamic Modeling of Intracellular Processes
Helge Hass, Carolin Loos, … Clemens Kreutz·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 6, 2019
- Learning dynamical systems with biochemically informed neural ordinary differential equations
Luís L. Fonseca, Reinhard Laubenbacher, Lucas Böttcher·bioRxiv·May 28, 2026
- Assessing biological network dynamics: Comparing numerical simulations with analytical decomposition of parameter space
Kishore Hari, William Duncan, … Tomáš Gedeon·npj Systems Biology and ApplicationsPeer-reviewed·Jul 3, 2023
- A dynamical low-rank approach to solve the chemical master equation for biological reaction networks
Martina Prugger, Lukas Daniel Einkemmer, Carlos F. Lopez·Journal of Computational PhysicsPeer-reviewed·May 29, 2023