The Impact of Anesthesia on Ultrasonic Glymphatic Perturbation Protocol: Alertness, and Glymphatic Influx
H. Xiao, B. Shrestha, A. A. Cruz, J. Iliff, T. Porter, M. Aryal
Abstract
We have recently discovered that transcranial low-intensity focused ultrasound can enhance glymphatic transport, which facilitates the removal of waste metabolites from the brain in a preclinical rat model [1]. The central hypothesis was that ultrasound, functioning as a pressure wave, has the potential to influence the convective forces generated by arterial pulsations, which are also pressure waves, serving as the primary mechanism for glymphatic transport. Importantly, our data revealed that (i) the ultrasound protocol (650 kHz at 0.2MPa for 10 minutes to the entire brain) is safe, as histological evaluations showed no parenchymal damage and no difference in levels of neuronal degeneration or astrocytic activation 72 hours after the intervention, and (ii) the required pressure is significantly low, 10 times below FDA-approved limits for diagnostic ultrasound, and can be achieved using existing FDA-approved clinical transcranial focused ultrasound systems, suggesting its ease of translation into clinical applications. However, the study was conducted under specific physiological states with approximately 2.5% isoflurane-induced anesthesia. There is a limitation in fully understanding the potential bioeffects of ultrasound within the glymphatic space across various physiological conditions, primarily because the glymphatic transports efficiency fluctuates with anesthetically induced physiological states. Hence, establishing standardized protocols of ultrasonic glymphatic transport at optimal physiological state is crucial for ensuring consistent, reliable results across research laboratories during the preclinical development of this technique. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate how ultrasonically manipulated glymphatic transport is influenced by different levels of isoflurane-induced anesthetic conditions, including 3% (just above 2.5%), 2% (slightly below 2.5%), and 1.5% (quasi-awake state, resembling the existing clinical practice of ultrasound treatment). Results show that the impact of ultrasound during glymphatic transport depends on the level of anesthesia. It increases alertness in lightly anesthetized animals and improves glymphatic transport, while it induces drowsiness in heavily anesthetized animals, leading to reduced glymphatic transport. The results suggest that lighter anesthesia is beneficial for efficient ultrasonic glymphatic transport, making it more in line with the awake state in current clinical ultrasound treatments, thus advancing the technology closer to clinical translation.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Mechanically manipulate glymphatic transportation by ultrasound combined with microbubbles
- Noninvasive Ultrasonic Glymphatic Induction Enhances Intrathecal Drug Delivery
M. Aryal, Q. Zhou, … R. D. Airan·bioRxiv·Oct 21, 2020
- Enhancing glymphatic function with very low-intensity ultrasound via the transient receptor potential vanilloid-4-aquaporin-4 pathway
Chueh‐Hung Wu, Wei‐Hao Liao, … Wen‐Shiang Chen·Advanced SciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 4, 2024
- Enhanced glymphatic CSF tracer influx during α2-adrenergic agonist anesthesia is independent of tracer injection duration
Tianyi Tong, Evan J. Newbold, … Maiken Nedergaard·bioRxiv·Jun 30, 2026
- Effects of isoflurane and urethane anesthetics on glutamate neurotransmission in rat brain using in vivo amperometry
Joshua A. Beitchman, Gokul Krishna, … Theresa Currier Thomas·BMC NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 10, 2023
- Glymphatic clearance is enhanced during sleep
Erik Kroesbergen, Laurence V. Riesselmann, … Yuki Mori·bioRxiv·Aug 24, 2024