BMC GenomicsGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
A comparative analysis of chromatin accessibility in cattle, pig, and mouse tissues
Michelle M. HalsteadiD, Colin KerniD, Perot SaelaoiD, Ying WangiD, Ganrea Chanthavixay, Juan F F MedranoiD, Alison Louise Van EenennaamiD, Ian F. KorfiD, Christopher Keith TuggleiD, Catherine W. ErnstiD, Huaijun ZhouiD, Pablo J. RossiD
Abstract
BackgroundAlthough considerable progress has been made towards annotating the noncoding portion of the human and mouse genomes, regulatory elements in other species, such as livestock, remain poorly characterized. This lack of functional annotation poses a substantial roadblock to agricultural research and diminishes the value of these species as model organisms. As active regulatory elements are typically characterized by chromatin accessibility, we implemented the Assay for Transposase Accessible Chromatin (ATAC-seq) to annotate and characterize regulatory elements in pigs and cattle, given a set of eight adult tissues. ResultsOverall, 306,304 and 273,594 active regulatory elements were identified in pig and cattle, respectively. 71,478 porcine and 47,454 bovine regulatory elements were highly tissue-specific and were correspondingly enriched for binding motifs of known tissue-specific transcription factors. However, in every tissue the most prevalent accessible motif corresponded to the insulator CTCF, suggesting pervasive involvement in 3-D chromatin organization. Taking advantage of a similar dataset in mouse, open chromatin in pig, cattle, and mice were compared, revealing that the conservation of regulatory elements, in terms of sequence identity and accessibility, was consistent with evolutionary distance; whereas pig and cattle shared about 20% of accessible sites, mice and ungulates only had about 10% of accessible sites in common. Furthermore, conservation of accessibility was more prevalent at promoters than at intergenic regions. ConclusionsThe lack of conserved accessibility at distal elements is consistent with rapid evolution of enhancers, and further emphasizes the need to annotate regulatory elements in individual species, rather than inferring elements based on homology. This atlas of chromatin accessibility in cattle and pig constitutes a substantial step towards annotating livestock genomes and dissecting the regulatory link between genome and phenome.
- organism: mouse
- organism: plant (other)
- assay: ATAC-seq
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: database / resource
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 71
- FWCI
- 4.54
- Field percentile
- top 3%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- An ATAC-seq atlas of chromatin accessibility in mouse tissues
Chuanyu Liu, Mingyue Wang, … Longqi Liu·Scientific DataPeer-reviewed·May 20, 2019
- Profiling of open chromatin in developing pig (Sus scrofa) muscle to identify regulatory regions
Mazdak Salavati, Shernae A. Woolley, … Emily L. Clark·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 13, 2021
- Multi-omics analysis reveals critical cis-regulatory roles of transposable elements in livestock genomes
Chao Wang, Bowen Lei, … Yuwen Liu·iSciencePeer-reviewed·Feb 18, 2025
- Profiling of accessible chromatin regions across multiple plant species and cell types reveals common gene regulatory principles and new control modules
K. A. Maher, M. Bajic, … R. B. Deal·bioRxiv·Nov 3, 2017
- Differential chromatin accessibility between pre- and post-natal stages highlights putative causal regulatory variants in pig skeletal muscle
Ervin Shishmani, Andrea Rau, … Elisabetta Giuffra·World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (WCGALP)Peer-reviewed·Feb 26, 2026
- Transcriptome and chromatin structure annotation of liver, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from four livestock species.
Sylvain Foissac, Sarah Djebali, … Elisabetta Giuffra·bioRxiv·May 16, 2019