bioRxivMolecular BiologyPreprint
Lysine-independent ubiquitination and degradation of REV-ERBα involves a bi-functional degradation control sequence at its N-terminus
Abstract
REV-ERB and REV-ERB{beta} proteins play crucial roles in linking the circadian system to overt daily rhythms in mammalian physiology and behavior. In most tissues, REV-ERB protein robustly cycles such that it is detected only within a tight interval of 4-6 hours each day, suggesting both its synthesis and degradation are tightly controlled. Several ubiquitin ligases are known to drive REV-ERB degradation, but how they interact with REV-ERB and which lysine residues they ubiquitinate to promote degradation are unknown. In this study, we attempted to identify both ubiquitin-ligase-binding and ubiquitination sites within REV-ERB required for its degradation. Surprisingly, mutating all lysine residues, the common sites for ubiquitin conjugation, in REV-ERB to arginines (K20R), did very little to impair its degradation in cells. K20R were degraded much faster by co-expression of two E3 ligases, SIAH2 or SPSB4, suggesting possible N-terminal ubiquitination. To explore this, we examined if small deletions at the N-terminus of REV-ERB would alter its degradation. Interestingly, deletion of amino acid (AA) residues 2 to 9 (delAA2-9) clearly resulted in a less stable REV-ERB. We found that it was the length (i.e. 8 AA), and not the specific sequence, that confers stability in this region. Simultaneously, we also mapped the interaction site of the E3 ligase SPSB4 to this same region, specifically requiring AA4-9 of REV-ERB. Thus, the first 9 AA of REV-ERB has two opposing roles in regulating REV-ERB turnover. Further, deleting eight additional AAs (delAA2-17) from the N-terminus strongly prevents REV-ERB degradation. Combined, these results suggest that complex interactions within the first 25AAs potentially act as an endogenous switch that allows REV-ERB to exist in a stabilized conformation in order to accumulate at one time of day, but then rapidly shifts to a destabilized form, to enhance its removal at the end of its daily cycle.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Identification of biological processes and signaling pathways for the knockout of REV-ERB in mouse brain
Jing Li, Wei Wang, Hanming Gu·bioRxiv·Nov 22, 2021
- The E3/E4 ubiquitin ligase UFD-2 mediates negative feedback on Raf protein stability
Robert A. Townley, Augustin Deniaud, … Claire de la Cova·Science SignalingPeer-reviewed·Aug 29, 2023
- Hierarchical and scaffolded phosphorylation of two degrons controls PER2 stability
J. C. Francisco, D. M. Virshup·bioRxiv·Nov 2, 2023
- YIPPEE/YPEL5 regulates circadian period by modulating PER ubiquitination and stability
Meilin Li, Yue Zhou, … Yong Zhang·bioRxiv·Apr 30, 2026
- Distinct control of PERIOD2 degradation and circadian rhythms by the oncoprotein MDM2
Jingjing Liu, Xianlin Zou, … Carla V. Finkielstein·Science SignalingPeer-reviewed·Nov 13, 2018
- Chromatin association promotes UBR5-mediated degradation of Rb
Shuyuan Zhang, Michael Charles Lanz, … Jan Marcel Skotheim·bioRxiv·Apr 17, 2026