TPS Expression, Not Copy Number, Explains Aroma Diversity among Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) Cultivars
Malin PeterseniD, Manon PaineauiD, Andrea MinioiD, Noé CocheteliD, Rosa Elia Figueroa-BalderasiD, Lars H. KruseiD, Sarah K. Davis, Jöerg BohlmanniD, Dario CantùiD, Simone Diego CastellariniD
Abstract
Terpenoids are major contributors to grapevine berry and wine aroma, with mono- and sesquiterpenoids exhibiting substantial variation among cultivars. However, the genetic basis of cultivar-specific terpenoid profiles remains only partially understood due to gene duplications that expanded the terpenoid synthase (TPS) gene family across different cultivars. Here, we compared haplotype-resolved genome assemblies for seven cultivars to analyze copy number variation and expression profiles of terpenoid biosynthesis genes and terpenoid accumulation throughout flower and berry development. These assemblies resolved duplicated TPS loci at the haplotype level, revealing extensive copy number variation across cultivars and between haplotypes within a cultivar, with up to 44 mono-TPS genes on a single haplotype. We identified eight specific monoterpenoids as key drivers of cultivar-specific profiles in ripe berries. Total TPS transcript abundance correlated strongly with total terpenoid accumulation over time. In contrast, TPS copy number was largely decoupled from both expression and terpenoid accumulation, indicating that expression regulation, rather than gene dosage, underlies aroma differences among cultivars. Transcript-metabolite network analysis revealed both expected correlations between specific TPS genes and putative products as well as novel associations. We functionally validated selected candidate TPS in Nicotiana benthamiana, characterizing -farnesene, {beta}-ocimene, and multi-product -terpineol synthases. The in vivo characterization demonstrated that minor sequence variations can alter catalytic activity and product profile. Together, these findings show that the extensive duplication of TPS genes in grapevine does not itself determine terpenoid output; instead, cultivar-specific aroma arises from how these genes are expressed and from sequence differences that shape enzyme activity.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Haplotype-specific expression of a terpene synthase underlies linalool variation in the grapevine cultivar Riesling
Jerry Lin, Mélanie Massonnet, … Dario Cantù·Journal of Experimental BotanyPeer-reviewed·Sep 5, 2026
- Allelic variation at a terpene synthase locus shapes wine monoterpene composition and aroma
Jerry Lin, Annegret Cantu, … Dario Cantù·bioRxiv·May 13, 2026
- Multi-omics approach combined with functional characterization of genes enlightens the formation of certain aromatic compounds in Vitis vinifera cv. Assyrtiko grape berries
Konstantina Leontaridou, Urška Vrhovšek, … Angelos K. Kanellis·bioRxiv·Jul 25, 2025
- Genome-Wide Discovery and Characterization of Terpene Synthases Contributing to Strawberry Aroma Metabolism
Mary A. Madera, Farida Yasmin, … Philipp Zerbe·PLANT PHYSIOLOGYPeer-reviewed·May 21, 2026
- Transcriptomic analysis of temporal shifts in berry development between two grapevine cultivars of the Pinot family reveals potential genes controlling ripening time
Jens Theine, Daniela Holtgräwe, … Bernd Weißhaar·BMC Plant BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 7, 2021
- The phased diploid genome assembly of Vitis vinifera cv. Shiraz.
Cristóbal A. Onetto, Christopher M. Ward, Anthony R. Borneman·Australian Journal of Grape and Wine ResearchPeer-reviewed·May 11, 2023