bioRxivPharmacology & ToxicologyPreprint
Toward a first principles understanding of the activation and deactivation mechanisms of class A G-protein coupled receptors and voltage-gated cation channels
Abstract
We previously reported a first principles multi-scale theory called Biodynamics that attributes cellular functions to sets of coupled molecular and ionic fluxes operating in the non-equilibrium/non-linear dynamic regime. Fluxes build and decay over time and undergo dynamic non-covalent intra- and intermolecular state transitions powered principally by the storage and release of free energy to/from the H-bond networks of external and internal solvation (that we refer to as solvation dynamics) at rates governed by the desolvation and resolvation costs incurred during their entry and exit, respectively. We have thus far examined the functional state transitions of cereblon and COVID Mpro in this context, and now turn to the agonist-induced activating and deactivating state transitions of class A G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) and membrane potential-/dipole potential-induced activating and deactivating state transitions of voltage-gated cation channels (VGCCs). We analyzed crystal structures of the activated and deactivated forms of the human {beta}2-adrenergic receptor ({beta}2-AR) and cryo-EM structures of the activated and deactivated forms of Nav1.7 channels. We postulate that activation and deactivation of the {beta}2-AR is conveyed by switchable changes in transmembrane helix (TMH) orientations relative to extracellular loop 2 (ECL2) and curvature of TMH6 and TMH7, all of which are powered by solvation free energy and kickstarted by agonist binding. The known activation and deactivation mechanisms of Nav1.7 consist of S4 translations toward and away from the extracellular membrane surface, respectively, resulting in S4-S5 linker repositioning, followed by rearrangements of the S5 and S6 helices. The latter TMH conveys channel opening and closing by respectively curving away from and toward the central pore axis. We postulate that all of these rearrangements are likewise powered by solvation free energy and kickstarted by changes in the membrane and dipole potentials. The results of our study may facilitate structure-based design of GPCR agonists/antagonists and mitigation of drug-induced ion channel blockade.
- organism: human
- assay: structural biology
- research focus: protein folding & dynamics
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Intracellular Passage Of Na+ In An Active State G Protein Coupled Receptor
o. N. Vickery, C. A. Carvalheda, … U. Zachariae·bioRxiv·Jul 21, 2017
- Energy landscapes reveal agonist control of GPCR activation via microswitches
O. Fleetwood, P. Matricon, … L. Delemotte·bioRxiv·Nov 17, 2019
- Who's driving? Common evolutionary mechanism of activation of class A GPCRs
Antoni Marciniak, Paweł Kozielewicz, … Lucie Delemotte·bioRxiv·Jun 30, 2026
- Class A GPCRs use the membrane potential to increase their sensitivity and selectivity
D. Shalaeva, D. Cherepanov, … A. Mulkidjanian·bioRxiv·Mar 23, 2019
- An arginine switch drives the stepwise activation of β-arrestin
Jeong Seok Ji, Yaejin Yun, … Hyung Ho Lee·bioRxiv·Jan 5, 2025
- Activation microswitches in GPCRs function as rheostats in cell membrane
N. Ma, S. Lee, N. Vaidehi·BiochemistryPeer-reviewed·Oct 27, 2020