Automated Long Axial Field of View PET Image Processing and Kinetic Modelling with the TurBO Toolbox
Jouni TuiskuiD, Santeri Palonen, Henri KärpijokiiD, Aino Latva‐RaskuiD, Nelli TuomolaiD, Harri HarjuiD, Sergey V. NesteroviD, Vesa OikoneniD, Hidehiro IidaiD, Jarmo TeuhoiD, Chunlei Han, Tomi KarjalaineniD, Anna K. KirjavaineniD, Johan Rajader, Riku KléniD, Pirjo NuutilaiD, Juhani M. KnuutiiD, Lauri NummenmaaiD
Abstract
Long axial field of view (LAFOV) PET imaging requires a high level of automation and standardization, as the large number of target tissues increases the manual workload significantly. We introduce an automated analysis pipeline (TurBO, Turku total-BOdy) for preprocessing and kinetic modelling of LAFOV [15O]H2O and [18F]FDG PET data, enabling efficient and reproducible analysis of tissue perfusion and metabolism at regional and voxel-levels. The approach employs automated processing including co-registration, motion correction, automated CT segmentation for region of interest (ROI) delineation, image-derived input determination, and region-specific kinetic modelling of PET data. MethodsWe validated the analysis pipeline using Biograph Vision Quadra (Siemens Healthineers) LAFOV PET/CT scans from 21 subjects scanned with [15O]H2O and 16 subjects scanned with [18F]FDG using six segmented CT-based ROIs (cortical brain gray matter, left iliopsoas muscle, right kidney cortex and medulla, pancreas, spleen and liver) representing different levels of blood flow and glucose metabolism. ResultsModel fits showed good quality with consistent parameter estimates at both regional and voxel-levels (R{superscript 2} > 0.83 for [15O]H2O, R{superscript 2} > 0.99 for [18F]FDG). Estimates from manual and automated input functions were in concordance (R{superscript 2} > 0.74 for [15O]H2O, and R{superscript 2} > 0.78 for [18F]FDG) with minimal bias ( 0.82 for [15O]H2O and R{superscript 2} > 0.83 for [18F]FDG), while motion correction had little impact on parameter estimates (R{superscript 2} > 0.71 for [15O]H2O and R{superscript 2} > 0.78 for [18F]FDG) compared with uncorrected data. ConclusionOur automated analysis pipeline provides reliable and reproducible parameter estimates across different regions, with an approximate processing time of 1-1.5 h per subject. This pipeline completely automates LAFOV PET analysis, reducing manual effort and enabling reproducible studies of inter-organ blood flow and metabolism, including brain-body interactions.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 18.68
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Source-to-Target Automatic Rotating Estimation (STARE) -- A publicly-available, blood-free quantification approach for PET tracers with irreversible kinetics: Theoretical framework and validation for FDG
Elizabeth A. Bartlett, Robert Todd Ogden, … Francesca Zanderigo·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jan 10, 2022
- Parametric Imaging Of FDG-PET Data Using Physiology And Iterative Regularization: Application To The Hepatic And Renal Systems
Mara Scussolini, Sara Garbarino, … Michele Piana·bioRxiv·May 11, 2017
- Biomarker Localization, Analysis, Visualization, Extraction, and Registration (BLAzER) Workflow for Research and Clinical Brain PET Applications
Fabio Raman, Sameera Grandhi, … Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·Journal of Alzheimer s DiseasePeer-reviewed·Jul 12, 2019
- Kinetic modeling of 18F-PI-2620 binding in the brain using an image-derived input function with total-body PET
Anjan Bhattarai, Emily Nicole Holy, … Audrey Peiwen Fan·EJNMMI ResearchPeer-reviewed·May 30, 2025
- Magia: Robust automated image processing and kinetic modeling toolbox for PET neuroinformatics
Tomi Karjalainen, Jouni Tuisku, … Lauri Nummenmaa·Frontiers in NeuroinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 4, 2020
- Computational approaches for parametric imaging of dynamic PET data
S. Crisci, M. Piana, … M. Scussolini·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2019