Sign in
NeuroscienceEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Peer-reviewed journal article

Automated Long Axial Field of View PET Image Processing and Kinetic Modelling with the TurBO Toolbox

Jouni TuiskuiD, Santeri Palonen, Henri KärpijokiiD, Aino Latva‐RaskuiD, Nelli TuomolaiD, Harri HarjuiD, Sergey V. NesteroviD, Vesa OikoneniD, Hidehiro IidaiD, Jarmo TeuhoiD, Chunlei Han, Tomi KarjalaineniD, Anna K. KirjavaineniD, Johan Rajader, Riku KléniD, Pirjo NuutilaiD, Juhani M. KnuutiiD, Lauri NummenmaaiD

Abstract

Long axial field of view (LAFOV) PET imaging requires a high level of automation and standardization, as the large number of target tissues increases the manual workload significantly. We introduce an automated analysis pipeline (TurBO, Turku total-BOdy) for preprocessing and kinetic modelling of LAFOV [15O]H2O and [18F]FDG PET data, enabling efficient and reproducible analysis of tissue perfusion and metabolism at regional and voxel-levels. The approach employs automated processing including co-registration, motion correction, automated CT segmentation for region of interest (ROI) delineation, image-derived input determination, and region-specific kinetic modelling of PET data. MethodsWe validated the analysis pipeline using Biograph Vision Quadra (Siemens Healthineers) LAFOV PET/CT scans from 21 subjects scanned with [15O]H2O and 16 subjects scanned with [18F]FDG using six segmented CT-based ROIs (cortical brain gray matter, left iliopsoas muscle, right kidney cortex and medulla, pancreas, spleen and liver) representing different levels of blood flow and glucose metabolism. ResultsModel fits showed good quality with consistent parameter estimates at both regional and voxel-levels (R{superscript 2} > 0.83 for [15O]H2O, R{superscript 2} > 0.99 for [18F]FDG). Estimates from manual and automated input functions were in concordance (R{superscript 2} > 0.74 for [15O]H2O, and R{superscript 2} > 0.78 for [18F]FDG) with minimal bias ( 0.82 for [15O]H2O and R{superscript 2} > 0.83 for [18F]FDG), while motion correction had little impact on parameter estimates (R{superscript 2} > 0.71 for [15O]H2O and R{superscript 2} > 0.78 for [18F]FDG) compared with uncorrected data. ConclusionOur automated analysis pipeline provides reliable and reproducible parameter estimates across different regions, with an approximate processing time of 1-1.5 h per subject. This pipeline completely automates LAFOV PET analysis, reducing manual effort and enabling reproducible studies of inter-organ blood flow and metabolism, including brain-body interactions.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
4
FWCI
18.68
Field percentile
top 1%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISBartlett '22Scussolini '17Raman '19Bhattarai '25Karjalainen '20Crisci '19
58% semantic matchMolecular Biology
Elizabeth A. Bartlett, Robert Todd Ogden, J. John Mann+1 more·NeuroImage·Jan 10, 2022· 5 citations