Scientific ReportsGenetic & Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed journal article
A FinnGen pilot clinical recall study for Alzheimer's disease
Valtteri JulkuneniD, Claudia SchwarziD, Juho Kalapudas, Merja Hallikainen, Aino‐Kaisa PiironeniD, Arto MannermaaiD, Hanna Kujala, T. LaitineniD, Veli‐Matti KosmaiD, Teemu I. PaajaneniD, Reetta K. KälviäineniD, Mikko HiltuneniD, Sanna‐Kaisa HerukkaiD, Sari Kärkkäinen, Tarja KokkolaiD, Mia UrjanssoniD, FinnGeniD, Hilkka S. SoinineniD, Sami HeikkineniD, Tomi P. MäkeläiD, Anastasia Kytölä, Andrea GannaiD, Anu Jalanko, Aoxing LiuiD, Arto LehistöiD, , Zhihao DingiD
- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 2.03
- Field percentile
- top 14%
Abstract
BackgroundSuccessful development of novel therapies requires that clinical trials are conducted in patient cohorts with the highest benefit-to-risk ratio. Population-based biobanks with comprehensive health and genetic data from large numbers of individuals hold promise to facilitate identification of trial participants, particularly when interventions need to start while symptoms are still mild, such as for Alzheimers disease (AD). However, few studies have yet tested whether recalling biobank participants into clinical follow-up studies is feasible. ObjectiveTo establish a process for clinical recall studies from FinnGen and demonstrate the feasibility to systematically ascertain customized clinical data from FinnGen participants with ICD10 diagnosis of AD or mild cognitive disorder (MCD). MethodsSingle-center cross-sectional study testing blood-based biomarkers and cognitive functioning in-person, computer-based and remote. Results19% (27/140) of a pre-specified FinnGen subcohort were successfully recalled and completed the study. Hospital records largely validated registry entries. For 8/12 MCD patients, other reasons than AD were identified as underlying diagnosis. Cognitive measures correlated across platforms, with highest consistencies for dementia screening (r=0.818) and semantic fluency (r=0.764), respectively, for in-person versus telephone-administered tests. GFAP (p<0.002) and pTau-181 (p<0.020) most reliably differentiated AD from MCD participants. ConclusionsInformative, customized clinical recall studies from FinnGen are feasible.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Proper names from story recall are associated with beta-amyloid in cognitively unimpaired adults at risk for Alzheimer's disease
Kimberly Diggle Mueller, Rebecca L. Koscik, … Sterling C. Johnson·CortexPeer-reviewed·Jul 31, 2020
- Genetic characterization of the ALFA study: Uncovering genetic profiles in the Alzheimer's continuum.
Natàlia Vilor‐Tejedor, Patricia Genius, … for the ALFA study·Alzheimer s & DementiaPeer-reviewed·Dec 13, 2023
- Cognitive modeling of the Mnemonic Similarity Task as a digital biomarker for Alzheimer's Disease
Casey R. Vanderlip, Michael David Lee, Craig E.L. Stark·Alzheimer s & DementiaPeer-reviewed·Sep 6, 2024
- Association of object mnemonic discrimination deficit with age and AD biomarkers in older adults
Zhengshi Yang, Xiaowei Zhuang, … Dietmar Cordes·bioRxiv·Sep 17, 2026
- Delayed primacy recall performance predicts post mortem Alzheimers disease pathology from unimpaired ante mortem cognitive baseline
Davide Bruno, Kristina M. Gicas, … Melissa Lamar·Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease MonitoringPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024
- Genetic data and cognitively-defined late-onset Alzheimer’s disease subgroups
EPAD Study Group, Shubhabrata Mukherjee, … Paul K. Crane·Molecular PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Dec 4, 2018