Biometrical JournalGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
A new inverse probability of selection weighted Cox model to deal with outcome-dependent sampling in survival analysis
Vera H. ArntzeniD, Marta F. FioccoiD, Inge M. M. LakemaniD, Maartje NielseniD, Mar Rodríguez‐GirondoiD
- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.85
- Field percentile
- top 29%
Abstract
Motivated by the study of genetic effect modifiers of cancer, we examined weighting approaches to correct for ascertainment bias in survival analysis. Family-based outcome-dependent sampling is common in genetic epidemiology leading to study samples with too many events in comparison to the population and an overrepresentation of young, affected subjects. A usual approach to correct for ascertainment bias in this setting is to use an inverse probability-weighted Cox model, using weights based on external available population-based age-specific incidence rates of the type of cancer under investigation. However, the current approach is not general enough leading to invalid weights in relevant practical settings if oversampling of cases is not observed in all age groups. Based on the same principle of weighting observations by their inverse probability of selection, we propose a new, more general approach. We show the advantage of our new method using simulations and two real datasets. In both applications the goal is to assess the association between common susceptibility loci identified in Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) and cancer (colorectal and breast) using data collected through genetic testing in clinical genetics centers.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Slope-Hunter: A robust method for index-event bias correction in genome-wide association studies of subsequent traits
Osama Mahmoud, Frank Dudbridge, … Kate M. Tilling·bioRxiv·Jan 31, 2020
- Mortality Selection in a Genetic Sample and Implications for Association Studies
Benjamin W Domingue, Daniel W Belsky, … Jason Boardman·International Journal of EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 11, 2017
- Increasing Representativeness in the All of Us Cohort Using Inverse Probability Weighting
Manoj S. Kambara, Shivam Sharma, … Leonardo Mariño‐Ramírez·medRxiv·Oct 2, 2024
- Hypothesis Tests for Neyman’s Bias in Case-Control Studies
David Swanson, Rebecca Betensky, Chris Anderson·bioRxiv·Jul 31, 2016
- ADuLT: An efficient and robust time-to-event GWAS
Emil M. Pedersen, Esben Agerbo, … Bjarni Jóhann Vilhjálmsson·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 9, 2023
- Correction for participation bias in the UK Biobank reveals non-negligible impact on genetic associations and downstream analyses
Tabea Schoeler, Doug Speed, … Zoltán Kutalik·Nature Human BehaviourPeer-reviewed·Apr 27, 2023