Sign in
NeurosciencebioRxiv
Preprint

Within-electrode temporal envelope processing predicts multi-channel speech outcomes across cochlear implant pulse rates

Mahan AzadpouriD, Jonathan Neukam, Nicole Hope CapachiD, Mario A. SvirskyiD

Abstract

Cochlear implants (CIs) restore hearing by stimulating auditory neurons to encode amplitude envelopes across frequency bands, providing essential cues for speech recognition. This study investigated how stimulation pulse rate constrains temporal envelope processing and speech cue perception in ten post-lingually deaf CI users by evaluating amplitude modulation (AM) detection thresholds and consonant identification performance across pulse rates. The effects of pulse rate on temporal processing and speech perception were examined using both standard clinical multi-channel strategies and single-channel strategies designed to isolate within-channel envelope representations. Results revealed a significant decline in AM detection and consonant recognition performance at the lowest tested pulse rate of 125 pulses per second (pps), consistent with perceptual constraints on temporal processing at low carrier rates, rather than inadequate envelope sampling. At the highest pulse rate of 4000pps, a non-significant reduction in AM detection was observed which may be consistent with previously reported reductions in amplitude discrimination at high pulse rates. Consonant recognition performance remained stable across clinically relevant pulse rates (250-2000pps), though listener-specific pulse rate effects were observed. Notably, significant correlations were found between single-channel and multi-channel performance in AM detection and consonant recognition tasks. These findings support an important contribution of within-electrode temporal envelope processing to multi-channel speech perception and highlight the clinical relevance of individual variability in pulse rate effects.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISFang '26Carlyon '18Schnupp '23Buck '23Somers '18Verschueren '18
75% semantic matchNeuroscience
Shiyi Fang, T. Fleiner, Fei Peng+4 more·The Journal of Physiology·Apr 22, 2026