Within-electrode temporal envelope processing predicts multi-channel speech outcomes across cochlear implant pulse rates
Mahan AzadpouriD, Jonathan Neukam, Nicole Hope CapachiD, Mario A. SvirskyiD
Abstract
Cochlear implants (CIs) restore hearing by stimulating auditory neurons to encode amplitude envelopes across frequency bands, providing essential cues for speech recognition. This study investigated how stimulation pulse rate constrains temporal envelope processing and speech cue perception in ten post-lingually deaf CI users by evaluating amplitude modulation (AM) detection thresholds and consonant identification performance across pulse rates. The effects of pulse rate on temporal processing and speech perception were examined using both standard clinical multi-channel strategies and single-channel strategies designed to isolate within-channel envelope representations. Results revealed a significant decline in AM detection and consonant recognition performance at the lowest tested pulse rate of 125 pulses per second (pps), consistent with perceptual constraints on temporal processing at low carrier rates, rather than inadequate envelope sampling. At the highest pulse rate of 4000pps, a non-significant reduction in AM detection was observed which may be consistent with previously reported reductions in amplitude discrimination at high pulse rates. Consonant recognition performance remained stable across clinically relevant pulse rates (250-2000pps), though listener-specific pulse rate effects were observed. Notably, significant correlations were found between single-channel and multi-channel performance in AM detection and consonant recognition tasks. These findings support an important contribution of within-electrode temporal envelope processing to multi-channel speech perception and highlight the clinical relevance of individual variability in pulse rate effects.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Neurophysiological Sensitivity to Envelope and Pulse Timing Interaural Time Differences in Cochlear Implanted Rats with Different Hearing Experiences
Shiyi Fang, T. Fleiner, … Jan W. H. Schnupp·The Journal of PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 22, 2026
- Effect of chronic stimulation and stimulus level on temporal processing by cochlear implant listeners
Robert P. Carlyon, François Guérit, … John M. Deeks·Journal of the Association for Research in OtolaryngologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 12, 2018
- Is Inappropriate Pulse Timing Responsible for Poor Binaural Hearing with Cochlear Implants?
Jan W. H. Schnupp, Sarah Buchholz, … Nicole Roßkothen-Kuhl·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2023
- Interaural time difference sensitivity under binaural cochlear implant stimulation persists at high pulse rates up to 900 pps
Alexa N Buck, Sarah Buchholz, … Nicole Roßkothen-Kuhl·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Mar 7, 2023
- Neural tracking of the speech envelope in cochlear implant users
Ben Somers, Eline Verschueren, Tom Francart·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Oct 8, 2018
- Neural envelope tracking as a measure of speech understanding in cochlear implant users
Eline Verschueren, Ben Somers, Tom Francart·Hearing ResearchPeer-reviewed·Dec 14, 2018