BMC BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Guidelines for cell-type heterogeneity quantification based on a comparative analysis of reference-free DNA methylation deconvolution software
Clémentine DecampsiD, Florian PrivéiD, Raphael BacheriD, Daniel JostiD, Arthur Waguet, Eugene Andres HousemaniD, Eugene LurieiD, Pavlo LutsikiD, Aleksandar MilosavljeviciD, Michael SchereriD, Michaël G. B. BlumiD, Magali RichardiD
Abstract
Cell-type heterogeneity of tumors is a key factor in tumor progression and response to chemotherapy. Tumor cell-type heterogeneity, defined as the proportion of the various cell-types in a tumor, can be inferred from DNA methylation of surgical specimens. However, confounding factors known to associate with methylation values, such as age and sex, complicate accurate inference of cell-type proportions. While reference-free algorithms have been developed to infer cell-type proportions from DNA methylation, a comparative evaluation of the performance of these methods is still lacking.\n\nHere we use simulations to evaluate several computational pipelines based on the software packages MeDeCom, EDec, and RefFreeEWAS. We identify that accounting for confounders, feature selection, and the choice of the number of estimated cell types are critical steps for inferring cell-type proportions. We find that removal of methylation probes which are correlated with confounder variables reduces the error of inference by 30-35%, and that selection of cell-type informative probes has similar effect. We show that Cattells rule based on the scree plot is a powerful tool to determine the number of cell-types. Once the pre-treatment steps are achieved, the three deconvolution methods provide comparable results. We observe that all the algorithms performance improves when inter-sample variation of cell-type proportions is large or when the number of available samples is large. We find that under specific circumstances the methods are sensitive to the initialization method, suggesting that averaging different solutions or optimizing initialization is an avenue for future research. Based on the lessons learned, to facilitate pipeline validation and catalyze further pipeline improvement by the community, we develop a benchmark pipeline for inference of cell-type proportions and implement it in the R package medepir.
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: deconvolution
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: statistical model
- approach: benchmark study
- Citations
- 42
- FWCI
- 2.76
- Field percentile
- top 8%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Reference-free deconvolution of DNA methylation data and mediation by cell composition effects
Eugene Andres Houseman, Molly L Kile, … Carmen J Marsit·bioRxiv·Jan 23, 2016
- Unifying DNA methylation-based in silico cell-type deconvolution with deconvMe
Alexander Dietrich, Lina-Liv Willruth, … Markus List·Bioinformatics AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Dec 26, 2024
- Uncertainty quantification of reference based cellular deconvolution algorithms
Dorothea Seiler Vellame, Gemma L. Shireby, … Eilis J. Hannon·bioRxiv·Jun 15, 2022
- Systematic evaluation of cell-type deconvolution pipelines for sequencing-based bulk DNA methylomes
Yunhee Jeong, Lisa Barros de Andrade e Sousa, … Pavlo Lutsik·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 6, 2022
- Reference-free deconvolution of complex DNA methylation data - a systematic protocol
Michael Scherer, Petr V. Nazarov, … Pavlo Lutsik·Nature ProtocolsPeer-reviewed·Sep 25, 2020
- Multi-cell type deconvolution using a probabilistic model for single-molecule DNA methylation haplotypes
Irene Unterman, Dana Avrahami, … Benjamin P. Berman·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 10, 2024