bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
Blended Genome Exome (BGE) as a Cost Efficient Alternative to Deep Whole Genomes or Arrays
Matthew T. DeFeliceiD, Jonna GrimsbyiD, Daniel P. HowriganiD, Kai YuaniD, Sinéad B. ChapmaniD, Christine R. StevensiD, Samuel DeLuca, Megan Townsend, Joseph D. BuxbaumiD, Margaret Ann Pericak‐VanceiD, Shengying QiniD, Dan Joseph SteiniD, Solomon TeferraiD, Ramnik J. XavieriD, Hailiang HuangiD, Alicia R. MartiniD, Benjamin M. NealeiD
Abstract
Genomic scientists have long been promised cheaper DNA sequencing, but deep whole genomes are still costly, especially when considered for large cohorts in population-level studies. More affordable options include microarrays + imputation, whole exome sequencing (WES), or low-pass whole genome sequencing (WGS) + imputation. WES + array + imputation has recently been shown to yield 99% of association signals detected by WGS. However, a method free from ascertainment biases of arrays or the need for merging different data types that still benefits from deeper exome coverage to enhance novel coding variant detection does not exist. We developed a new, combined, "Blended Genome Exome" (BGE) in which a whole genome library is generated, an aliquot of that genome is amplified by PCR, the exome regions are selected and enriched, and the genome and exome libraries are combined back into a single tube for sequencing (33% exome, 67% genome). This creates a single CRAM with a low-coverage whole genome (2-3x) combined with a higher coverage exome (30-40x). This BGE can be used for imputing common variants throughout the genome as well as for calling rare coding variants. We tested this new method and observed >99% r2 concordance between imputed BGE data and existing 30x WGS data for exome and genome variants. BGE can serve as a useful and cost-efficient alternative sequencing product for genomic researchers, requiring ten-fold less sequencing compared to 30x WGS without the need for complicated harmonization of array and sequencing data.
- assay: whole-exome sequencing
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: imputation
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 18
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A blended genome and exome sequencing method captures genetic variation in an unbiased, high-quality, and cost-effective manner
Toni A. Boltz, Benjamin B. Chu, … Alicia R. Martin·bioRxiv·Sep 6, 2024
- WEGS: a cost-effective sequencing method for genetic studies combining high-depth whole exome and low-depth whole genome
Claude Bhérer, Robert J. M. Eveleigh, … Daniel Taliun·npj Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed·Feb 7, 2024
- Whole-genome sequencing is more powerful than whole-exome sequencing for detecting exome variants
Aziz Belkadi, Alexandre Bolze, … Laurent Abel·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Apr 28, 2015
- A new massively parallel nanoball sequencing platform for whole exome research
Yu Xu, Zhe Lin, … Qiang Gao·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 25, 2019
- Evaluation of Whole Exome Sequencing as an Alternative of BeadChip and Whole Genome Sequencing in Human Population Genetic Analysis
Zoltán Maróti, Zsolt Boldogkői, … Tibor Kalmár·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Oct 29, 2018
- Sequencing and Imputation in GWAS: Cost-Effective Strategies to Increase Power and Genomic Coverage Across Diverse Populations
Corbin Quick, Pramod Anugu, … Christian Fuchsberger·Genetic EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 9, 2020