On estimating evolutionary probabilities of population variants
Abstract
BackgroundThe evolutionary probability (EP) of an allele in a DNA or protein sequence predicts evolutionarily permissible (ePerm; EP [≥] 0.05) and forbidden (eForb; EP < 0.05) variants. EP of an allele represents an independent evolutionary expectation of observing an allele in a population based solely on the long-term substitution patterns captured in a multiple sequence alignment. In the neutral theory, EP and population frequencies can be compared to identify neutral and non-neutral alleles. This approach has been used to discover candidate adaptive polymorphisms in humans, which are eForbs segregating with high frequencies. The original method to compute EP requires the evolutionary relationships and divergence times of species in the sequence alignment (a timetree), which are not known with certainty for most datasets. This requirement impedes a general use of the original EP formulation. Here, we present an approach in which the phylogeny and times are inferred from the sequence alignment itself prior to the EP calculation. We evaluate if the modified EP approach produces results that are similar to those from the original method. ResultsWe compared EP estimates from the original and the modified approaches by using more than 18,000 protein sequence alignments containing orthologous sequences from 46 vertebrate species. For the original EP calculations, we used species relationships from UCSC and divergence times from TimeTree web resource, and the resulting EP estimates were considered to be the ground truth. We found that the modified approaches produced reasonable EP estimates for HGMD disease missense variant and 1000 Genomes Project missense variant datasets. Our results showed that reliable estimates of EP can be obtained without a priori knowledge of the sequence phylogeny and divergence times. We also found that, in order to obtain robust EP estimates, it is important to assemble a dataset with many sequences, sampling from a diversity of species groups. ConclusionWe conclude that the modified EP approach will be generally applicable for alignments and enable the detection of potentially neutral, deleterious, and adaptive alleles in populations.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Adaptive landscape of protein variation in human exomes
R. Patel, M. D. Sanderford, … S. Kumar·bioRxiv·Mar 14, 2018
- Enrichment in conservative amino acid changes among fixed and standing missense variations in slow evolving proteins
- Entrenchment and contingency in neutral protein evolution with epistasis
Lisa Schmelkin, Vincenzo Carnevale, … Sudhir Kumar·bioRxiv·Jan 9, 2025
- In vivo functional phenotypes from a computational epistatic model of evolution
S. Alvarez, C. M. Nartey, … F. Morcos·bioRxiv·May 24, 2023
- Linking phenotypic and genotypic variation: a relaxed phylogenetic approach using the probabilistic programming language Stan
Patrick Gemmell·bioRxiv·Jan 23, 2024
- Emergent time scales of epistasis in protein evolution
Leonardo Di Bari, Matteo Bisardi, … Francesco Zamponi·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Sep 26, 2024