BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
neoepiscope Improves Neoepitope Prediction with Multi-variant Phasing
Mary Ann WoodiD, Austin NguyeniD, Adam J. StruckiD, Kyle EllrottiD, Abhinav NelloreiD, Reid F. ThompsoniD
Abstract
The vast majority of tools for neoepitope prediction from DNA sequencing of complementary tumor and normal patient samples do not consider germline context or the potential for co-occurrence of two or more somatic variants on the same mRNA transcript. Without consideration of these phenomena, existing approaches are likely to produce both false positive and false negative results, resulting in an inaccurate and incomplete picture of the cancer neoepitope landscape. We developed neoepiscope chiefly to address this issue for single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and insertions/deletions (indels), and herein illustrate how germline and somatic variant phasing affects neoepitope prediction across multiple datasets. We estimate that up to [~]5% of neoepitopes arising from SNVs and indels may require variant phasing for their accurate assessment. neoepiscope is performant, flexible, and supports several major histocompatibility complex binding affinity prediction tools. We have released neoepiscope as open-source software (MIT license, https://github.com/pdxgx/neoepiscope) for broad use.\n\nKEY POINTSO_LIGermline context and somatic variant phasing are important for neoepitope prediction\nC_LIO_LIMany popular neoepitope prediction tools have issues of performance and reproducibility\nC_LIO_LIWe describe and provide performant software for accurate neoepitope prediction from DNA-seq data\nC_LI
- assay: whole-exome sequencing
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 35
- FWCI
- 1.57
- Field percentile
- top 17%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Microphaser - a small-scale phasing approach for improved personalized neopeptidome creation
Jan Förster, David Laehnemann, … Johannes Köster·bioRxiv·Aug 11, 2021
- Population-level distribution and putative immunogenicity of cancer neoepitopes
M. A. Wood, M. Paralkar, … R. F. Thompson·BMC CancerPeer-reviewed·Apr 13, 2018
- LENS - Landscape of Effective Neoantigens Software
S. P. Vensko, K. Olsen, … B. Vincent·bioRxiv·Apr 1, 2022
- NeoHeadHunter: an algorithm for the detection, ranking and probabilistic classification of neoepitope candidates
Xiaofei Zhao·bioRxiv·Oct 25, 2023
- Splicing neoepitope prediction is sensitive to methodological differences
Laurie Prélot, Julianne K. David, … Gunnar Rätsch·bioRxiv·Sep 10, 2025
- Seq2Neo: a comprehensive pipeline for cancer neoantigen im-munogenicity prediction
Kaixuan Diao, Jing Chen, … Xuesong Liu·International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2022