Heterochrony in orthodenticle expression is associated with ommatidial size variation between Drosophila species
M. Torres-Oliva, E. Buchberger, A. D. Buffry, M. Kittelmann, G. Guerrero, L. Sumner-Rooney, P. M. C. Gaspar, G. C. Bullinger, J. Figueras Jimenez, F. Casares, S. Arif, D. S. Nunes, N. Posnien, A. P. McGregor, I. Almudi
Abstract
The compound eyes of insects exhibit extensive variation in ommatidia number and size, which affects how they see and underlies adaptations in their vision to different environments and lifestyles. However, very little is known about the genetic and developmental bases of differences in compound eye size. We previously showed that the larger eyes of Drosophila mauritiana compared to D. simulans is generally caused by differences in ommatidia size rather than number. Furthermore, we identified an X-linked chromosomal region in D. mauritiana that results in larger eyes when introgressed into D. simulans. Here, we used a combination of fine-scale mapping and gene expression analysis to further investigate positional candidate genes on the X chromosome. We found earlier expression of orthodenticle (otd) during ommatidial maturation in third instar larvae in D. mauritiana than in D. simulans, and we show that this gene is required for the correct organisation and size of ommatidia in D. melanogaster. We discovered that the activity of an otd eye enhancer is consistent with the difference in the expression of this gene between species, with the D. mauritiana enhancer sequence driving earlier expression than that of D. simulans. We also identified potential direct targets of Otd that are differentially expressed between D. mauritiana and D. simulans during ommatidial maturation. Taken together, our results suggest that differential timing of otd expression contributes to natural variation in ommatidia size between D. mauritiana and D. simulans, which provides new insights into the mechanisms underlying the regulation and evolution of compound eye size in insects.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evolution of compound eye morphology underlies differences in vision between closely related Drosophila species
A. D. Buffry, J. P. Currea, … M. Kittelmann·bioRxiv·Jul 16, 2023
- Characterization of the genetic architecture underlying eye size variation within Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans
P. Gaspar, S. Arif, … A. P. McGregor·bioRxiv·Oct 30, 2019
- Altering the temporal regulation of one transcription factor drives sensory trade-offs
Ariane Ramaekers, Annelies Claeys, … Bassem A. Hassan·Developmental CellPeer-reviewed·Aug 22, 2019
- Specific expression and function of the Six3 optix in serially homologous organs
Amer Al Khatib, Natalia Siomava, … Fernando Casares·Biology OpenPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2017
- Multiple loci linked to inversions are associated with eye size variation in species of the Drosophila virilis phylad
M. Reis, G. Wiegleb, … N. Posnien·bioRxiv·Mar 24, 2020
- Homothorax Controls a Binary Rhodopsin Switch in Drosophila Ocelli
Abhishek Kumar Mishra, Cornelia Fritsch, … Simon G. Sprecher·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 27, 2021