bioRxivBiophysics
Mechanism of Mycolactone Toxin Membrane Permeation: Atomistic vs Coarse-Grained MARTINI Simulations
Abstract
Mycolactone, a cytotoxic and immunosuppressive macrolide produced by Mycobacterium ulcerans, is the central virulent factor in the skin disease Buruli ulcer. This multifunctional cytotoxin affects fundamental cellular processes such as cell adhesion, immune response and cell death by targeting various cellular structures. Developing effective diagnostics that target mycolactone has been challenging, potentially due to suspected interactions with lipophilic architectures, including membranes. To better understand the pathogenesis of Buruli ulcer disease, aid in the development of diagnostics, and learn how amphiphiles in general use lipid trafficking to navigate the host environment, we seek to understand the nature of mycolactone-membrane interactions. Herein we characterize how the two dominant isomers of mycolactone (A and B) interact with and permeate DPPC membranes with all-atom molecular dynamics simulations employing transition tempered metadynamics, and compare these results with those obtained by MARTINI coarse-grained simulations. Our all-atom simulations reveal that both isomers have a strong preference to associate with the membrane, although their mechanisms and energetics of membrane permeation differ slightly. Water molecules are found to play an important role in the permeation process. Although the MARTINI coarse-grained simulations give the correct free energy of membrane association, they fail to capture the mechanism of permeation and role of water during permeation as seen in all-atom simulations.
- research focus: protein folding & dynamics
- research focus: cell signaling & trafficking
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- approach: mechanistic / dynamical model
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Can Membrane Composition Traffic Toxins? Mycolactone and Preferential Membrane Interactions
G. C. A. da Hora, J. D. M. Nguyen, J. M. Swanson·bioRxiv·May 31, 2022
- Mycolactone A vs. B: Does localization or association explain isomer-specific toxicity?
J. D. M. Nguyen, G. C. A. Da Hora, J. M. Swanson·bioRxiv·May 19, 2023
- Dynamic Architecture of Mycobacterial Outer Membranes Revealed by All-Atom Simulations
Turner P. Brown, Matthieu G. Chavent, Wonpil Im·eLifePeer-reviewed·Apr 21, 2026
- Coarse-Grained Simulations of Mycobacterial Outer Membranes Reveal Fluidity-Dependent PDIM Redistribution Across Different Lipid Environments
Bibek Acharya, Sudarshan Lamichhane, … Wonpil Im·BiomacromoleculesPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2026
- Serum lipoproteins and lipoarabinomannan suppress the inflammatory response induced by the mycolactone toxin
S. Jakhar, K. D. Lenz, … J. Z. Kubicek-Sutherland·bioRxiv·Jun 6, 2022
- Drug-bacterial membrane interactions: A Tale of two force fields
S. Basu, S. Mandal, P. K. Maiti·bioRxiv·Sep 27, 2023